Example: Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement

Our custom writing team will address all your assignment
requirements and provide a top-grade paper; 100% plagiarism free.
We provide 24/7 customer Support.

Order Essay Papers with a Few Clicks



Get my paper done

By clicking “Get my paper done”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related emails.

Example: Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement

title: Synod Comparison Grid and Corroboration/Advocacy Set-forthment Number of sources: 3 Paper instructions: To Prepare: Select a mandible that has been designed (referable attributable particular that has been settled) using the congressional websites granted in the Learning Resources. The Assignment: (1- to 2-pepoch Comparison Grid; 1- to 2-pepoch Synod Corroboration/Advocacy Set-forthment) Part 1: Synod Comparison Grid Based on the vigor-cognate mandible (proposed, referable attributable attributable attributable settled) you chosen, entire the Synod Comparison Grid Template. Be positive to discourse the following: Determine the legislative fixed of the mandible you bear reviewed. Identify the proponents/opponents of the mandible. Identify the target populations discourseed by the mandible. Where in the mode is the mandible currently? Is it in hearings or committees? Is it receiving compel coverage? Part 2: Synod Corroboration/Advocacy

title: Parliament Comparison Grid and Witness/Advocacy Recitement
Number of sources: 3
Paper instructions:
To Prepare:

Select a mandible that has been designed (referable attributable attributable undivided that has been decisive) using the congressional websites supposing in the Learning Resources.
The Assignment: (1- to 2-pdate Comparison Grid; 1- to 2-pdate Parliament Witness/Advocacy Recitement)

Part 1: Parliament Comparison Grid

Based on the feelinginess-cognate mandible (proposed, referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable decisive) you clarified, consummate the Parliament Comparison Grid Template. Be firm to harangue the following:

Determine the legislative urgent of the mandible you accept reviewed.
Identify the proponents/opponents of the mandible.
Identify the target populations harangueed by the mandible.
Where in the arrangement is the mandible currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
Is it receiving encroach coverage?
Part 2: Parliament Witness/Advocacy Recitement

Based on the feelinginess-cognate mandible you clarified, enunciate a 1- to 2-pdate Parliament Witness/Advocacy Recitement that haranguees the following:

Advocate a aspect restraint the mandible you clarified and transcribe witness in maintenance of your aspect.
Describe how you would harangue the enemy to your aspect. Be restricted and get patterns.
Recommobject at lowest undivided chastisement to the mandible in maintenance of your aspect.

=====
Sample Exempt Essay Topic Answer

Parliament Comparison Grid

Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Professor’s Name
Date

Parliament Comparison Grid
Health-cognate Mandible Name
Protecting Americans with Premassive Stipulations Act of 2019
Mandible Number
H.R. 986
Description
The mandible tenders that Americans with premassive stipulations should voluntarily admission heed extraneously restrictions. It opposes the essay by Trump synod to baffle the achievement that Obamaheed is already having on the feelinginessheed sector (H.R. 986, 2019). The mandible as-well rejects any appropriation counter abjuration of heed. It as-well tenders that the federal recite should get recites with departed funds to utensil Obamaheed achievementfully.

Federal or Recite? Federal. The mandible affects the federal synod and it is financed by Rep. Kuster, Ann M in Congress.
Legislative Urgent
The object is to inferior the consume of heed and reform the admissionibility of heed natant Americans with premassive stipulations. It rejects the abjuration of heed and maintenances the Affordable Heed Act (H.R. 986, 2019).
Proponents/ Enemys Proponents: Maintenanceers betray that the mandible is applicable departed it entireure protection the feelinginess of Americans opposing their premassive stipulations. It maintenances the encircleation of the extra consume of heed restraint mass with premassive stipulations (H.R. 986, 2019). It as-well opposes the essay by Trump synod to sabotdate the Affordable Heed Act.

Opponents: They sift the mandible has departed options restraint Americans and it sway growth the premiums restraint recite identical feelinginess security. They as-well sift that expanding the availability of short-term feelinginessheed plans would get departed options and inferior the consume (H.R. 986, 2019).

Target Population Mass with premassive stipulations.

Status of the mandible (Is it in hearings or committees? Is it receiving encroach coverage?)
The House liked the mandible on May 9th, 2019. It was enslaved to the Senate restraint aid reflectations beneath the public authority (H.R. 986, 2019).
The mandible is currently receiving encroach coverdate departed it haranguees sundry manifestations that baffle the availability of heed restraint mass with premassive stipulations.
Public Referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablees/Comments

The mandible is an conducive disentanglement to harangue discrepancies in the American feelinginessheed sector. It entireure as-well reject the judgment that hinders Americans with premassive stipulations from admissioning power heed. It entireure as-well nullify synod sabotdate counter the Affordable Heed Act milestones.
Parliament Witness
I strongly maintenance the mandible departed it gets entire Americans with an opening restraint reasonable and power heed. The mandible as-well rejects the massive judgment that baffles the ability of Americans from admissioning power heed (Lyon, 2018). Restraint pattern, millions of Americans are denial from premassive stipulations such as diabetes, cancer, or feeling diseases. If such mass canreferable attributable attributable admission power and reasonable heed, it would be counter the distillation of resembling opening restraint entire. Most of the mass with premassive stipulations are the ancienten who would be required to stable extra specie to admission feelinginessheed uses (Lyon, 2018). Scrutiny such a population to stable restraint departed would word their admission to heed. Eventually, departed mass would expire annually attributable to nullifyable stipulations. Low-income families are as-well reflected in the mandible departed it tenders that mass with premassive stipulations should referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable stable restraint extra capital (Glied & Jackson, 2018). Therefore, the mandible is conducive in boosting admissionibility to heed restraint mass of entire dates abutting oppidan and bucolic America. Feelinginessheed uses is a nucleus use that the synod should get to entire Americans timeliness seemly admission to quit a social emergency.
Proponents sift that pleasing mass with premassive stipulations in the feelinginessheed rule would growth feelinginessheed security premiums. Although their controversy is available, they do referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable reflect that scrutiny ancienten mass to stable extra consumes would trigger a social emergency (Lyon, 2018). The manifestation of security premiums is a total that the synod and other stakeholders can communicate with partially. Restraint pattern, through the Affordable Heed Act, the synod regulated the ever-increasing consume of heed. It is as-well honored to referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablee that the feelinginessheed rule should be exempt of any detriment or judgment counter restricted mass. Additionally, entireowing hospitals to assault extra capital to mass with premassive stipulations would bring to discrepancies. Some hospitals would assault departed timeliness others would assault short (Glied & Jackson, 2018). Therefore, to quit a emergency, it is imported to prefer a cunning that would improve epower in the feelinginessheed sector. The parliament entireure as-well nullify aid growths in the consume of heed and diminish the deaths cognate to nullifyable deaths abutting Americans with sundry feelinginess stipulations.
Undivided of the chastisements I would tender to the mandible is that it should get usdate heed restraint ancienten mass departed a actual date and low-income families. Restraint pattern, it should tender that ancienten mass who are 70 years and aloft should hancient heed at a subsidized consume. The standpoint is to enfirm entire Americans can subsist a feelinginessy animation and continue their goals (Lyon, 2018). Children from low-income families may referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable proof the similar opportunities as those from high-income families. It would as-well get them with opportunities to continue their dreams that would object the cycle of destitution. On the other laborer, the ancienten win power, admissionible, and affordable heed. They should spobject their definite days on world in a honored sort. Most of the ancienten mass accept obeyd the realm in sundry ways and thus it is good to adduce them power heed when they are ancient. Ancienten mass object up in heed homes and sequestered solely indetermination to expire. They survive hopeshort when they canreferable attributable attributable admission power heed or when their families canreferable attributable attributable admit heed of them (Glied & Jackson, 2018). Some expire in a indirect distillation departed they acquire that entire their efforts to obey the province did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable substance. Therefore, the synod should labor to get power heed to entire ancienten and low-income families.

References
Glied, S. A., & Jackson, A. (2018). How would Americans’ out-of-pocket consumes modify if security plans were entireowed to reject coverdate restraint premassive stipulations?. Manifestation Brief (Commonw Fund), 2018, 1-9.
Lyon, S. M. (2018). Feelinginessheed Reform: An Update. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 15(4), 417-419.
Protecting Americans with Premassive Stipulations Act of 2019, H.R. 986, 116th Cong. (2019).

IN NEED OF CUSTOM WRITING HELP FOR THIS PAPER OR SIMILAR ASSIGNMENTS? PLACE ORDER NOW & GET INSTANT ASSISTANCE!

essay assignment writing

  1. 1

    You fill in the Order Form by providing assignment details and all necessary instructions..

  2. 2

    We assign a writer who has similar background and a degree in your subject.

  3. 3

    The assigned professional takes the assignment and starts working on it.

  4. 4

    When everything is ready, we send the paper to your personal account and your email.

5 to 15% OFF Discount!!

For all your orders at Homeworkacetutors.com get discounted prices!
Top quality & 100% plagiarism-free content.