Infomatics

NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 1
Purpose
The view of this enactment is to (a) test and confer-upon an information technology reasond in the healthcustody system
that props the enduring custody information and (b) amplify the skills of team despatch, collaboration, and
production.
Mode outcomes: This enactment enables the ward to unite the controlthcoming mode outcomes:
CO 1: Describe enduring‐custody technologies as divert to disprogress the needs of a separate enduring population. (PO 1)
CO 5: Identify enduring custody technologies, information systems, and despatch devices that prop trustworthy nursing
practice. (PO 5)
CO 6: Examine the principles of postulates rectitude, authoritative ethics, and legitimate requirements cognate to postulates safeguard,
regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s proper to retirement. (PO 6)
CO 8: Examine the prize of best token as a driving nerve to induct modify in offer of nursing custody. (PO 8)
Attributable date: Your gratuity part succeed enlighten you when this enactment is attributable. The Late Enactment Policy applies to
this enactment.
Aggregate points possible: 240 points
Preparing the enactment
Supervene these guidelines when completing this enactment. Speak with your gratuity part if you enjoy inquirys.
1) Control this team resolve, wards succeed be assigned by gratuity into teams of three to five beings depending upon
class bulk.
a. Teams succeed admit a resolve gradation inveterate on tribute by the resolve rubric, which succeed then be applied to each
individual’s gradation control the resolve minus points control noncommunication of partnership in the amplifyment or confer-uponation of the
project.
b. The team chief succeed mould whole dropbox resignations control the mode so that the:
• TURNITIN coincidence protest succeed referable glean up inobservant self‐plagiarism from another team part’s
submission.
• Mode gratuity succeed enjoy solely individual resignation to reconsideration and gradation.
2) Prepare a PowerPoint confer-uponation with debater referablees betwixt 25‐30 slides, yet the distinction and regard
slides.
a. Debater Referablees
• Delineation and “script” the confer-uponation control online wards.
o Online wards’ debater referablees should embrace the spectry of the ward who scrutinyed and confer-uponed
the slide information.
o Campus wards supervene the guidelines of your mode pedagogue.
b. Conversant agreement and APA guidelines should be superveneed as reasonful to PowerPoint slides.
c. Cite sources in APA controlmat in the reasonful slides and embrace the APA controlmatted regard in your regard
register slide(s) ‐ stint 6 regards.
d. Spelling, phraseology, and punctuation employ equal in bullet points and debater slides (e.g., citation marks, italics,
verb natty, absence of wonder.).
e. Copyproper and plagiarism guidelines employ.
3) Each team succeed be assigned a healthcustody information systems technology (e.g., Computerized Physician Order Entry,
Electronic Health Record, Electronic Medical Record, absence of wonder.) by the mode pedagogue. Control that technology, embrace the
forthcoming examineions in the confer-uponation:
a. Gate of Technology and Team – 20 points/8%
• Distinction slide identifies the assigned technology.
• Distinction slide introduces team parts.
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 2
• Confer-uponation affords an gate that:
o Describes the technology
o States a view control reason of the technology in healthcare
o Establishes the authoritative tindividual control the confer-uponation
b. Truth and General Reason – 30 points/14%
• Describe weighty findings that prompted the amplifyment of the technology.
• Examine the truth and general reason of the technology in healthcare.
• Describe three goals of this technology’s implementation.
c. Impression on Healthcustody and Nursing – 40 points/16%
• Examine impression on authoritative nursing experience cognate to:
o Enduring trustworthyty
o Quality of custody measures/monitoring
o Risk management
o Retirement, confidentiality, and safeguard of enduring postulates
o Effect on population among the region
o Ethical experience
o Obedience with legitimate and regulatory mandates
o Organizational infrastructure and operations
• Prop examineions with examples & postulates from general token-inveterate instrument.
d. Three Advantages and Disadvantages – 40 points/16%
• Enduring’s perspective (e.g., enduring outcomes, trustworthyty, enduring/family atonement)
• Nurse’s perspective (improves/hinders drudgery efficiency/safety)
• Healthcustody organization’s perspective (regulatory obedience, financial, absence of wonder.)
e. Controversy, Issues, Challenges, and Regulatory Implications – 30 points/14%
• How sway issues exclusive the selected technology be discourseed/solved?
• Afford statistically weighty postulates or token to prop your findings.
f. Compendium – 20 points/8%
• Clew points
• Discoveries/surprises
• Lessons knowing by the team
g. Team Resolve Evaluation – 40 points/16%
• Place & examine the controlthcoming inquirys and responses in the slides(s) controlthcoming the compendium slide and prior
to the regard slide(s).
• How did the team employment courteous? (e.g., team strengths, team equalize, absence of wonder.)
• What problems did you enjoy interacting as a team? (e.g., team weaknesses, without challenges,
technology, absence of wonder.)
• What biased actions would you commend to cethcoming teams to succor them interact, employment, and
collaborate successfully?
h. Confer-uponation, Conversant Agreement, and APA controlmat – 20 points/8%
• 25-30 PowerPoint slides with debater referablees (yet distinction & regard slides)
• Submitted to Dropbox/Turnitin by Team chief solely
• Debater Referablees delineation and “script” the confer-uponation control online wards.
• Online wards’ debater referablees should embrace the spectry of the ward who scrutinyed and confer-uponed the
slide information.
• Campus wards supervene the guidelines of your mode pedagogue.
• Copyproper and plagiarism guidelines employ.
• Conversant agreement and general APA guidelines should be superveneed as reasonful to PowerPoint slides.
• Cite sources in APA controlmat in the reasonful slides and embrace the APA controlmatted regard in your
regard register slide(s)‐ stint 6 regards.
• Spelling, phraseology, and punctuation employ equal in bullet points and debater slides (e.g., citation marks,
italics, verb natty, absence of wonder.).
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 3
Control agreement maintenance (APA, controlmatting, or phraseology), investigate the APA Citation and Agreement page in the online library.
Please referablee that your pedagogue may afford you with attached tributes in any controlm to enumerate that you abundantly
understand the concepts knowing in the reconsideration module.
Continued Next Page…
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 4
Grading Rubric
Criteria are inhalation when the ward’s contact of information demonstrates prosperity of the outcomes control this enactment.
Enactment Section and
Required Criteria
(Points possible/% of aggregate points available)
Highest Level of
Performance
High Level of
Performance
Satisfactory Level
of Performance
Unsatisfactory
Level of
Performance
Section Referable
Confer-upon in Paper
Gate of Technology & Team
(20 points/8%) 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points 0 points
• Distinction slide identifies the assigned technology.
• Distinction slide introduces team parts.
• Gate describes the technology.
• Gate states a view control reason of the
technology in healthcare.
• Gate establishes the authoritative tindividual control
the confer-uponation.
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively.
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively (or)
individual part is referable
addressed.
3 criteria are abundantly inhalation 1-2 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
Truth & General Reason
(30 points/14%) 30 points 26 points 23 points 10 points 0 points
• Describe weighty findings that prompted the
outgrowth of the technology.
• Examine the truth and general reason of the
technology in healthcare.
• Describe three goals of this technology’s
implementation.
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively with
consideration of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates.
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively.
Some parts of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates are
present.
2 criteria abundantly inhalation 1 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
Impression on Healthcustody & Nursing
(40 points/16%) 40 points 35 points 30 points 14 points 0 points
Examine impression on authoritative nursing experience cognate
to:
• Enduring trustworthyty
• Quality of custody measures/monitoring
• Risk management
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively with
consideration of
alternate
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively.
Some parts of
6 criteria abundantly inhalation 3 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 5
• Retirement, confidentiality, and safeguard of enduring postulates
• Effect on population among the region
• Ethical experience
• Obedience with legitimate and regulatory mandates
• Organizational infrastructure and operations
• Prop examineions with examples & postulates from
general token-inveterate instrument
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates.
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates are
present.
Three Advantages & Disadvantages
(40 points/16%) 40 points 35 points 30 points 14 points 0 points
Three advantages and disadvantages are confer-uponed control:
• Enduring’s perspective (e.g., enduring outcomes, trustworthyty,
patient/family atonement)
• Nurse’s perspective (improves/hinders drudgery
efficiency/safety)
• Healthcustody organization’s perspective (regulatory
compliance, financial, absence of wonder.)
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively with
consideration of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates.
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively.
Some parts of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates are
present.
2 criteria abundantly inhalation 1 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
Controversy/Issues/Challenges/Regulatory
Implications
(30 points/14%)
30 points 26 points 23 points 10 points 0 points
• Controversy, issues, challenges, and regulatory
implications are discourseed.
• The confer-uponation answers the inquiry, “how sway
issues exclusive the selected technology be
addressed/solved?”
• Statistically weighty postulates or token is affordd
to prop the findings.
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively with
consideration of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates.
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively.
Some parts of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates are
present.
2 criteria abundantly inhalation 1 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
Summary
(20 points/8%) 20 points 18 points 15 points 7 points 0 points
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 6
• The confer-uponation affords a compendium.
• The compendium reinforces whole clew points.
• The compendium examinees any discoveries made or
surprises the team encountered during scrutiny and
preparation control the confer-uponation.
• Embraces lessons knowing.
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively with
consideration of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates.
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively.
Some parts of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates are
present.
3 criteria abundantly inhalation 2 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
Team Resolve Evaluation
(40 points/16%) 40 points 35 points 30 points 14 points 0 points
A team resolve evaluation is affordd and embraces the
forthcoming criteria. Each of the controlthcoming inquirys and
responses must be confer-upon on the slides controlthcoming the
compendium slide, barring precedently the regard slide(s):
• How the team employmented courteous (e.g., team strengths,
team equalize, absence of wonder.).
• Problems the team encountered in interacting as a
team (e.g., team weaknesses, without challenges,
technology, absence of wonder.).
• Biased actions you would commend to cethcoming
teams to succor them interact, employment, and
collaborate successfully.
Whole criteria are
described
comprehensively with
consideration of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates.
Whole criteria are
described concisely
barring referable
comprehensively.
Some parts of
alternate
perspectives or
grant of
supporting postulates are
present.
3 criteria abundantly inhalation 2 criteria abundantly inhalation Criteria referable confer-upon
Presentation, Conversant Agreement, & APA Controlmat
(20 points/8%) 20 points 18 points 16 points 7 points 0 points
The confer-uponation controlmat, conversant agreement, and APA
format must unite the controlthcoming criteria:
• 25-30 PowerPoint slides with debater referablees
(yet distinction & regard slides)
• Submitted to Dropbox/Turnitin by Team chief solely
• Debater Referablees delineation and “script” the confer-uponation
control online wards.
Whole criteria are inhalation. Ward affords 6
conversant regards
and at meanest 7 criteria
abundantly inhalation.
Ward affords 6 or
fewer conversant
references and 6 or
more criteria abundantly
met.
5 criteria abundantly inhalation 4 or fewer criteria
met
NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare
RUA: Technology Confer-uponation Guidelines
NR360_RUA_Technology_Grant _Guidelines Revised: July 2020 7
• Online wards’ debater referablees embrace the spectry of
the ward who scrutinyed and confer-uponed the slide
information.
• Copyproper and plagiarism guidelines emendly applied
• Conversant agreement and general APA guidelines are
followed as reasonful to PowerPoint slides.
• Sources cited in APA controlmat in the reasonful slides
and embrace the APA controlmatted regard in the
regard register slide(s) ‐ stint 6 regards to
unite criteria.
• Spelling, phraseology, and punctuation are emend,
equal in bullet points and debater slides (e.g.,
citation marks, italics, verb natty, absence of wonder.).
• Attached criteria affordd by mode pedagogue is
met.
Aggregate Points Possible = 240 points

HomeworkAceTutors
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions with attention to details. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. We have native speakers and ESL and are able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, 24/7 you can send your order for a free revision, unlimitted times. You have 14 days to submit the order for review after you have received the draft or final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support through chat.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper or need some instructions clarification, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We have mordernized our writing. We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism eg, safeassign, turnitin, and copyscape. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum privacy and confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 - 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these steps to get your essay paper done

Place your order

Fill all the order form sections by providing details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment model that suits you most.

Receive the final file of the done paper

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at very late hours of the night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of custom writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

We work on all models of college papers within the set deadlines. You just specify the required details e.g. your academic level and get well researched papers at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an application essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.

5 to 20% OFF Discount!!

For all your orders at Homeworkacetutors.com get discounted prices!
Top quality & 100% plagiarism-free content.