NURS350-Research Critique

A analysis critique demonstrates your potential to critically learn an investigative research. For this project, select a analysis article associated to nursing.

Articles used for this project can’t be used for the opposite assignments (college students ought to discover new analysis articles for every new project).
The chosen articles must be unique analysis articles. Overview articles, idea evaluation, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative overview, and systemic overview shouldn’t be used.
Combined-methods research shouldn’t be used.
Dissertations shouldn’t be used.
Your critique ought to embrace the next:

Analysis Downside/Function

State the issue clearly as it’s introduced within the report.
Have the investigators positioned the research drawback inside the context of current data?
Will the research clear up an issue related to nursing?
State the aim of the analysis.
Overview of the Literature

Determine the ideas explored within the literature overview.
Have been the references present? If not, what do you suppose the explanations are?
Was there proof of reflexivity within the design (qualitative)?
Theoretical Framework

Are the theoretical ideas outlined and associated to the analysis?
Does the analysis draw solely on nursing idea or does it draw on idea from different disciplines?
Is a theoretical framework acknowledged on this analysis piece?
If not, counsel one which could be appropriate for the research.
Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions (Quantitative)

What are the unbiased and dependent variables on this research?
Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If that’s the case, are they concrete and measurable?
Is the analysis query or the speculation acknowledged? What’s it?
Conceptual Underpinnings, Analysis Questions (Qualitative)

Are key ideas outlined conceptually?
Is the philoosoophical foundation, underlying custom, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made specific and is it acceptable for the issue?
Are analysis questions explicitly acknowledged? Are the questions in step with the research’s philosophical foundation, underlying custom, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?
Methodology

What kind of design (quantitative, qualitative, and kind) was used on this research?
Was inductive or deductive reasoning used on this research?
State the pattern dimension and research inhabitants, sampling technique, and research setting.
Did the investigator select a likelihood or non-probability pattern?
State the kind of reliability and the validity of the measurement instruments (quantitative solely)
Qualitative research (reply the next questions along with these above besides the final bulleted merchandise)

Have been the strategies of gathering knowledge acceptable?
Have been knowledge gathered by means of two or extra strategies to realize triangulation?
Did the researcher ask the proper questions or make the proper observations and had been they recorded in an acceptable trend?
Was a enough quantity of information gathered?
Was the info of enough depth and richness?
Have been moral issues addressed? Have been acceptable procedures used to safeguard the rights of research contributors?

Information Evaluation

What knowledge evaluation instrument was used?
Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)
How had been the outcomes introduced within the research?
Have been the info administration (e.g., coding) and knowledge evaluation strategies sufficiently described? (qualitative)
Determine not less than one (1) discovering.
Abstract/Conclusions, Implications, and Suggestions

Do the themes adequately seize the which means of the info?
Did the evaluation yield an insightful, provocative and significant image of the phenomenon beneath investigation?
Have been strategies used to reinforce the trustworthiness of the info (and evaluation) and was the outline of these strategies satisfactory?
Are there clear rationalization of the boundaries/limitations, thick description, audit path?
What are the strengths and limitations of the research?
When it comes to the findings, can the researcher generalize to different populations? Clarify.
Consider the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (each qualitative and quantitative).
The physique of your paper must be four–6 double-spaced pages plus a canopy web page and a reference web page. The critique have to be connected to the article and comply with APA tips.

RUBRIC

NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Analysis Critique

Standards Rankings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeResearch Downside/Function

28 to >24.92 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Analysis drawback, goal of analysis, and relevance to nursing are clearly recognized.

24.92 to >21.zero pts
Principally Meets Expectations

Analysis drawback, goal of analysis, and relevance to nursing are considerably recognized.

21 to >16.52 pts
Beneath Expectations

Analysis drawback, goal of analysis, and relevance to nursing are principally absent or misidentified.

16.52 to >zero pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Analysis drawback, goal of analysis, and relevance to nursing are absent.

28 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeReview of the Literature

42 to >37.38 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations

Ideas explored within the literature overview are clearly recognized. Critique of the references is included and properly developed.

37.38 to >31.5 pts
Principally Meets Expectations

Ideas explored within the literature overview are considerably recognized. Critique of the references is included, however will not be totally developed.

31.5 to >24.78 pts
Beneath Expectations

Ideas explored within the literature overview are misidentified. Critique of the references is severely missing.

24.78 to >zero pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Ideas explored within the literature overview are absent. Critique of the references is absent.

42 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeTheoretical Framework

28 to >24.92 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations

A theoretical idea/framework is recognized and properly analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks an idea/framework, an acceptable one is usually recommended.

24.92 to >21.zero pts
Principally Meets Expectations

A theoretical
Hooked up please discover your Idea Map Affected person Data.
No matter data is lacking from the Idea Map Affected person Data be inventive however
make them inside regular values.

Add BUBBLEDE/REEDA assessments as final pages with Reference Web page All in APA format with Title Web page,
Physique, Reference Web page. NURS_316L-A – NURSING CONCEPT MAP RUBRIC

NURS_316L-A – NURSING CONCEPT MAP RUBRIC

Standards Rankings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeHistory of Current
Sickness

eight pts
Meets or Exceeds

HPI defined intimately with correct and in-depth understanding of chief grievance and supported by proof based mostly citations.

6.08 pts
Principally Meets

HPI defined in some element with reasonable understanding of chief grievance or no help from proof based mostly citations.

four pts
Approaches

HPI defined in restricted element with marginal understanding of chief grievance and no help from proof based mostly citations.

2 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

HPI particulars restricted with poor understanding of chief grievance and no proof based mostly citations to help.

eight pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomePhysical Evaluation, & Diagnostic exams/ procedures

eight pts
Meets or Exceeds

Identifies complete assessments parameters related to medical diagnoses with related diagnostic procedures supported by proof based mostly citations.

6.08 pts
Principally Meets

Identifies most related assessments parameters related to medical prognosis with related diagnostic procedures supported by proof based mostly citations.

four pts
Approaches

Identifies restricted related assessments parameters related to medical prognosis, related diagnostic procedures and vaguely supported by proof based mostly citations.

2 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations

Fails to establish related assessments parameters related to medical diagnoses, related diagnostic procedures or not supported by proof based mostly citations.

eight pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomePast Medical &
Surgical Historical past, Pathophysiology

eight pts
Meets or Exceeds

Previous medical/surgical historical past detailed with full rationalization of Pathophysiology for every prognosis & correct particulars with particular element associated to the consumer’s historical past and signs and supported by proof based mostly citations.

6.08 pts
Principally Meets

Previous medical/surgical historical past given with partial rationalization of recognized preexisting medical diagnoses & rationalization correct with some element associated to the consumer’s historical past and signs. supported by proof based mostly citations.

Homework Ace Tutors
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

. Our system allows you to choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a right qualification.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a wide team of professional writers with experience in academic and formal business writing.

Free Unlimited Revisions

Ordering custom papers from us is customer friendly. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support through chat or via email.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

We are familiar with various schools deadlines. As such, all papers are delivered on time to allow you time to review before submitting it. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We have mordernized our writing in accordance with current technologies. Our editors carefully review all quotations and references in the text. We also promise maximum privacy and confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our professional support agents are available 24 - 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience by answering all your queries.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these steps to get your essay paper done

Place your order

Fill all the order form sections by providing details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment model that suits you most.

Receive the final file of the done paper

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper when deadlines are closing at very late hours of the night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. You can order any assignment.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

We work on all models of college papers within the set deadlines. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an application essay. You can rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

We format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review.. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.