NRSG374 Unit Define Evaluation Activity 2 Particulars
\nCollege students are to supply an 1800 phrase critique of the supplied case research utilizing solely ONE CPG.
\nTo finish this process you’ll need to debate and critique related parts of the CPG and case research while upholding:
\n\u2022 NSQHS and\/or
\n\u2022 NMBA requirements and\/or
\n\u2022 Nationwide Palliative Care requirements
\nFAQ’s
\nDo we have to use all of those requirements to do nicely?
\n\u2022 Because the rubric states should you present -Excellent information of themes and ideas related to palliative care- it will show an impressive utility of your information to observe due to this fact utilizing requirements from greater than one of many above and relating them collectively to uphold your critique of the affected person care and assist the scientific observe guideline chosen will show glorious information and understanding. Utilizing one customary from one of many above won’t present robust utility of information. Nonetheless, a comparability of a number of requirements that as registered nurses we’re required to uphold will completely show very robust information and understanding, should you hyperlink them collectively nicely with proof primarily based observe (EBP)
\nThe place do I discover all of those requirements?
\nYou need to be conscious of the entire requirements above as they’ve been mentioned in lots of items all through your diploma, so now it’s time to show your information and convey them collectively. to help you We now have supplied hyperlinks beneath to every of the requirements we want you to utilise in your critique.
\nNSQHS
\nEight Nationwide security and High quality Well being Service Requirements to supply a nationally constant degree of care that may be anticipated by all shoppers from all well being organisations
\nhttps:\/\/www.safetyandquality.gov.au\/requirements\/nsqhs-standards
\nNMBA
\nSeven Requirements that each one Registered nurses should uphold to make sure that they preserve their registration and supply individual centred and proof primarily based preventative, healing, supportive, formative and palliative parts to their observe
\nhttps:\/\/www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au\/Codes-Tips-Statements\/Skilled-standards\/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx
\nNationwide Palliative Care Requirements
\n9 Nationwide palliative Care requirements that you realize nicely as they’ve fashioned the framework of NRSG374 and have been elementary for evaluation process 1
\nhttps:\/\/palliativecare.org.au\/requirements
\nHow do I relate these requirements to Frank’s experiences as a affected person?
\nThat is the place your important pondering and utility of principle to observe is required, we can not inform you how to do that, as a remaining yr nursing unit is crucial that you’re conscious of how all of those requirements, uphold and preserve, affected person centred care, dignity, affected person evaluation and security to call a couple of. Spend a while reviewing these and map out those that you just imagine are vital to your critique.
\nDue date: 14\/10\/2020 1600 hours
\nWeighting: 50%
\nSize and\/or format: 1800 phrases +\/- 10%
\nFunction: College students are required to show an understanding of how principle interprets into sensible nursing care and the way proof underpins greatest observe. Every scholar will evaluate and critique the care given within the Case Research supplied in line with their alternative of ONLY ONE of the supplied Medical Apply Tips (CPG\u2019s) greatest suited to the highlighted dialogue.
\nThe place will I discover the CPG’s that you really want me to make use of?
\nYou might be supplied with CPG’s for this process, you should select one in every of these solely to show the realm of care that you’re offering a critique of. You do NOT must search for different CPG’s to assist your work, nevertheless proof primarily based observe of peer reviewed journal publications are anticipated to additional reinforce your critique.
\nStudying outcomes assessed: LO1, LO5, LO7
\nEasy methods to submit: Digital Submission by way of Turnitin
\nReturn of project: The evaluation suggestions and grade shall be returned by way of Turnitin.
\nEvaluation standards: The evaluation shall be marked utilizing the criteria-based rubric. Please notice that in-text citations are included within the phrase depend while the reference listing is just not included within the phrase depend. Phrases which might be greater than 10% over the phrase depend won’t be thought-about
\nRubric – may be discovered within the unit define in Appendix B
\nHyperlink to the unit define beneath (should be logged in to LEO entry this)
\nhttps:\/\/leo.acu.edu.au\/pluginfile.php\/4187239\/mod_resource\/content material\/11\/NRSG374%20Unit%20Define%20.pdf
\nTake into account the Affected person State of affairs<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nFortunato (Frank) Rossi, is a 60 yr previous male who was born in Italy and Migrated to Australia together with his spouse in 1952, each he and his 58 yr previous spouse Sofia have twin citizenship in Italy and Australia. Frank and his spouse observe a powerful catholic religion. Frank has labored as a Secondary College Science and Arithmetic trainer at a neighborhood Catholic Secondary College for over 20 years and loves his job. He’s nicely revered by his colleagues and college students together with his very -quick wit and sharp thoughts with downside solving- that he prides himself on
\nSofia has been a keep at dwelling mom and carer for his or her 2 daughters:
\n\u2022 Eldest Daughter: Anna married Phillip have 2 daughters Bella (6) and Emily (three months)
\n\u2022 Youngest Daughter: Gabriella married Michael have 1 son (18 months previous)
\nCollectively they’ve had a beautiful life, with supportive household visiting from Italy and the Rossi household themselves with the ability to go over to Italy for a lot of household holidays. Each Frank and Sofia are very excited and having fun with being grandparents, they’re wanting ahead to Frank’s determination for an early ‘self funded retirement’ to get pleasure from extra time with the household. Frank has organized together with his faculty to have the ability to undertake a small quantity of informal instructing if he and his household require some small earnings as soon as he has retired, though he’s very eager to work in his backyard and spend time serving to to lift the grandchildren and benefit from the a few years of arduous work that he and Sofia put in to assist their household and the -good life- they’ve created in Australia.
\nThree months in the past
\nFrank skilled some confusion at work and a seizure -of unknown origin- that was witnessed by his spouse and grandchildren. Sofia instantly referred to as 000 and Frank was transported urgently beneath the care of paramedics to the emergency division (ED) of a significant metropolitan hospital as they lived near the town.
\nAcquire Cues and Info<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones 2018)<\/p>\n
Previous Medical Hx
\n\u2022 Tonsillectomy as a baby
\n\u2022 Ex smoker (give up smoking 25 years in the past was a packet a day smoker)
\n\u2022 Food plan Managed sort 2 Diabetes
\nPresent Historical past
\n\u2022 Seizures of unknown origin
\n\u2022 Confusion
\n\u2022 Headache
\n\u2022 Blurred imaginative and prescient
\n\u2022 Difficulties with downside fixing and determination making
\n\u2022 Gradual onset of speech disturbance
\n\u2022 Muscle Weak point
\n\u2022 Behaviour Modifications
\n\u2022 Vomiting
\n\u2022 Sleepiness
\n\u2022 sluggish pupil response to gentle
\nGathering new Info
\nFrank’s important indicators upon admission to medical ward
\nRR : 18
\nHR: 84 bpm
\nBP: 185\/95
\nSaO2: 96% on 3Lmin by way of N\/P (For Consolation measures)
\nRaised Intracranial Stress (ICP) – fixed headache
\nGCS – 9\/15 (eyes open to painful stimuli 2 \/ confused and disorientated verbal response Four \/ Irregular Flexion from painful stimuli three)
\nIntermittent Affected person Notes
\n-Affected person transferred to medical ward following noticed seizure of unknown origin by spouse and grandchildren who referred to as 000 for paramedic assist. In ED affected person’s acutely aware state was altered with confusion and incapability to recognise wife-
\n-Pupil measurement of each eyes was equal nevertheless pupillary gentle reflex is sluggish, constructive babinski signal response bilaterally, renal operate regular, affected person experiencing double incontinence, regular FBE and U&E-
\n-Preliminary MRI clearly confirmed abnormalities within the frontal and temporal areas, with a differential analysis of metastatic tumors within the mind from an unknown primary-
\nFrank was experiencing Elevated Intracranial Stress seemingly from mind lesions and doable Analysis of a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)
\nDifferential Diagnoses had not but been dominated out
\n-Affected person was administered mannitol each 12\/24 over 16 days to cut back Intra Cranial Stress (ICP,) Lyrica 150mg BD for seizure exercise, and Diazepam 10mg PRN….. 5 days publish preliminary seizure pt woke with regular cognitive responses and recognition of members of the family as soon as ICP had begun to cut back. Progressively pt’s potential to stroll with out deficit returned. Pt was totally continent, had good long run reminiscence recollection, nevertheless quick time period reminiscence was impacted-
\n-Pt’s oral mucosa had a number of abrasions and thrush evident from doable damage throughout seizure, affected person complained of mouth and throat ache, usually refusing to eat and drink-
\n-Differential Diagnoses of ?An infection, ?metastaic cerebral tumors have been mentioned nevertheless following lumbar puncture for assortment of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) specimen, and additional MRI outcomes displaying fast tumor progress notably in Frank’s frontal lobe simply 18 days after his preliminary ED presentation, the analysis was extremely indicative of a GBM-
\n-Affected person and spouse agreed to surgical tumor resection as a palliative measure with the information that this was not a remedy. Histopathology publish surgical resection clearly recognized a quickly rising GBM with temporal lobe metastases because the definitive analysis. A household assembly was organized with the neurosurgeon, oncologist, palliative guide, social employee, nurse unit supervisor, Frank and his household to debate options-
\nConfirmed Analysis, medical imaging and histopathology outcomes
\nFollowing CT Mind and MRI it was concluded that Frank had a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) in his frontal lobe which had seemingly metastasized in each temporal lobes, thus his prognosis was devastatingly a Stage IV GBM with a probable survival of two – three months with out surgical resection and\/or palliative radiation remedy.
\n-Household suggested to debate and full an Superior Care Directive while Frank was competent with the information that his ICP was more likely to enhance once more, and a call on methods to proceed with interventions was wanted. Palliative radiotherapy was supplied to Frank, he and his spouse refused and determined to be transferred to an inpatient palliative care unit nearer to their household the place he may go dwelling on day visits and likewise spend extra time together with his household on the palliative care unit, relatively than in a busy medical ward-
\nWhile on Day go away Frank had one other seizure and was transferred again to the Basic Ward for evaluate \u2026..Frank has now spent a while in a common medical ward on the Tertiary Stage Metropolis Hospital that he was initially transferred to by ambulance 2 weeks in the past following one other seizure while he was at dwelling throughout a go to there from the palliative care unit. Throughout his re-admission the next cues and knowledge have been collected and a analysis made. Previous to his switch and re- admission again to the palliative care unit in an outer metropolis hospital nearer to his household dwelling
\nProcessing Info<\/p>\n
Arrival and Admission to the Palliative Care Unit
\nFrank expressed some private household historical past and desires for his illness development
\n-Frank knowledgeable medical and nursing employees that his father had died from a GBM, stressed, undignified crawling on the ground from terminal restlessness and his solely need was to not die like his father had-
\n-Nil Superior Care Directive had been accomplished with Frank and Sofia as they thought they nonetheless had loads of time when knowledgeable about an ACD on the Medical Ward. Nonetheless, with Frank’s fluctuating ICP and disorientation he’s now deemed incompetent for any authorized choices or adjustments to his Will-
\n-Sofia was Frank’s medical Energy of Legal professional, presenting paperwork to assist this to the admitting palliative Care Staff-
\n-Sofia stayed with Frank throughout his admission and collectively they communicated that they needed him to be snug and dignified-
\nMedicines Commenced as soon as reviewed by Palliative Care Staff
\n\u2022 Dexamethasone: 8mg BD oral or S\/C (0800 and 1400) – To help in discount of ICP and Ache Aid from headache (Take into account unintended effects and behavioural adjustments from dexamethasone – How can these be managed?)
\n\u2022 Lyrica : 75mg BD Oral (0800 and 2000) – To handle seizure exercise (take into account unintended effects of Lyrica, are there different choices that might be thought-about for Frank?)
\n\u2022 MS Contin 10mg BD Oral (0800 and 2000hrs) – Analgesia
\nPRN Medicines
\n\u2022 Morphine 5-10mg S\/C
\n\u2022 Midazolam 2.5-5mg s\/c
\n\u2022 Ondansetron 8mg wafer (most dose of 16mg in 24 hours ) for nausea and vomiting
\nUpon arrival and admission to the palliative care unit the next referrals have been made
\n\u2022 Physiotherapist evaluate for evaluation of strolling help on account of rising parasethsia and weak spot in Frank’s legs
\n\u2022 OT dwelling evaluation and gear for dwelling visits
\n\u2022 Dietician to evaluate lack of urge for food, cachexia and anorexia
\n\u2022 Pastoral care
\n\u2022 Catholic Priest visits and want to be anointed ASAP
\nFiguring out issues\/points<\/p>\n
Issues for the Palliative Care Setting
\nFrank arrived on the Palliative Care unit late on a Sunday afternoon at 2pm, he was welcomed by his RN who undertook the next assessments and discussions between him, his spouse and two daughters:
\n\u2022 Welcome and orientation to the ward
\n\u2022 Falls Danger Evaluation
\n\u2022 Braden Stress Danger Evaluation
\n\u2022 Ache Evaluation
\n\u2022 Allied Well being Referrals made
\n\u2022 NOK contact particulars
\n\u2022 Modified Karnofsky Rating of 40-50
\n\u2022 RUG- ADL 10+
\n\u2022 SAS Device Partially Accomplished 5 of the 7 signs solely (deliberate to debate fatigue and bowel points tomorrow as affected person was sleepy and Sofia had gone dwelling to get garments and are available again to sleep the evening on the palliative care unit
\n\u2022 Palliative Care Part – -Deteriorating-
\nWhat may be some issues I want to contemplate as an RN caring for Frank and his household ?
\n\u2022 Nationwide Palliative Care Requirements ?
\n\u2022 NSQHS Requirements?
\n\u2022 NMBA Requirements?
\n\u2022 What do I learn about GBM sickness Trajectory?
\n\u2022 How will I recall data on GBM?
\n\u2022 The place are a number of the greatest areas to entry EBP on GBM and present requirements of care?
\n\u2022 What’s my function in supporting Frank’s spouse and household?
\n\u2022 What’s a SAS Device?
\n\u2022 What’s the Issues Severity Rating\/ (PSS)
\n\u2022 What’s a Modified karnofsky Rating?
\n\u2022 What’s a RUG-ADL Rating?
\n\u2022 How do I decide the Palliative Care Part that the affected person is in?
\n\u2022 Do I want to begin having some tough conversations and ask Frank and his spouse what they perceive about his prognosis?
\n\u2022 What a number of the issues that Frank might face?
\n\u2022 Are there any particular signs that I must be in search of when creating Frank’s care plan?
\n\u2022 What’s the pathophysiological response when somebody dies from a GBM?
\n\u2022 What ought to I anticipate?
\n\u2022 Am I able to cope with this?
\n\u2022 The place do I get assist as an RN if i really feel overwhelmed?
\n\u2022 Have I assumed sufficient about my very own nicely being and resilience for this skilled soeciality?
\n\u2022 How do I look after a deceased individual?
\n\u2022 How will I do know what to say?
\nstablishing Objectives and Taking Motion<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nMonday Morning
\nThroughout handover the day after Frank was admitted to the Palliative Care Unit we’re advised that he had a fall in a single day making an attempt to get to the bathroom and have become confused as he was unable to void, telling the nursing employees that his -feet felt numb-.
\nFrank was reviewed by the Evening Basic Medical Registrar who in session with the Urology Registrar determined to insert an IDC into Frank as on the bladder scan it confirmed that he had 800 mls in his bladder, and was in apparent discomfort from urinary retention. Throughout this process the medical and nursing employees gave Frank a breakthrough of s\/c morphine 5mg to help together with his discomfort. He had a full neurological evaluation with decrease limb weak spot evident, nevertheless nil pores and skin tears, breaks or lacerations to the physique or head. Frank appeared barely confused, though was oriented to position and individual.
\nFrank was despatched for additional scans within the morning displaying spinal metastases and a quickly advancing spinal wire compression, which might be thought-about uncommon however seen in circumstances of GBM. Spinal wire compression in these circumstances are often called drop metastasis whereby mobile unfold throughout the sub-arachnoid area travels throughout the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) onto the precise backbone as an impact of gravity often settling and rising within the decrease thoracic and higher lumbar backbone areas (Shripad, et al, 2015).
\nSpeaking with Frank and his spouse
\nFrank and his household are devastated by the information of the fast development and the information that he’s dropping extra independence with an incapability to stroll, and management his urinary and faecal continence. Frank turns into very withdrawn and refuses to take his medicine and eat.
\n(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nWednesday Afternoon
\nThe afternoon shift nurse walked in to introduce herself and located Frank alone as his spouse had left solely half an hour in the past, his respiratory is brief, shallow and laboured, with a respiratory charge of 6, Frank is aggitated and making an attempt to crawl off the bed, eradicating his garments and pulling out is S\/C breakthrough Intima’s (s\/c butterfly).
\nThe Palliative Care Staff evaluate Frank and recognise indicators and signs of terminal restlessness seemingly from an inreased ICP and ongoing illness progress. Frank’s spouse is named and knowledgeable of his sudden alteration in behaviour and suggested syringe driver was required to be commenced as his refusal to take his oral medicine notably his dexamethasone might have contributed to this cerebral oedema. Sofia agrees to subcutaneous medicine being commences as she promised him when his father was dying that she would do no matter she may to verify he died with dignity and respect. Sofia started making her method again to the Palliative Care Unit together with her household.
\nEvaluating and Figuring out new issues<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nWednesday Night
\nFrank has been unresponsive, and experiencing intervals of apnoea since earlier this afternoon. He has been commenced on a syringe driver containing dexamethasone, morphine and midazolam. Frank has not spoken to his household since they arrived nor has he held or squeezed Sofia’s hand.
\nFrank is now totally mattress certain thus his Modified Karnofsky Rating is 10, with him now within the -Terminal- Palliaitve Care Part.
\nFrank is on a stress mattress, and is being turned each 2-Four hours or when exhibiting sounds or indicators of moaning or restlessness to keep up consolation and pores and skin integrity, this takes x2 nursing employees to carry out this care, together with full mouth care as he’s now longer consuming or consuming.Frank’s RUG-ADL complete is now 18<\/p>\n
Wednesday Evening \/ Early Thursday Morning
\nAll through the evening Frank’s household stays by his aspect listening to his -rattly breathing-, nursing employees place Frank back and forth usually relatively than on his again to make sure that terminal secretions drain from his mouth, he’s administered PRN doses of glycopyrroalate S\/C as an anticholinergic agent to assist in extreme secretions and attempt to ease his work of respiratory.
\nAt 0215 hours Frank’s intervals of apnoea started to alter to Cheyne-Stoking upon examination Frank’s pupils had develop into mounted and dilated, he was cyanosed round his mouth, on his fingers, toes and knees. Frank’s household was with him within the room when inside a couple of quick minutes he ceased respiratory and died. His demise was a lot quicker than his household had anticipated leaving employees to assist them and clarify the outcomes of raised ICP and mind herniation into the mind stem, that may happen with a GBM analysis.
\nReflection<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nHigh quality of Life Issues
\nTake into account a number of the following as you choose one of many scientific observe tips equipped within the assessments folder to help you with working by way of Frank’s analysis, surgical preparation and transfer to the palliative care setting all in a matter of weeks from the time he was identified with a terminal sickness from being at a stage in his life that he had labored for to retire and revel in his household.
\n\u2022 Complications are multifactorial for affected person’s with a GBM inflicting not solely bodily ache however social, psychological and emotional points as they discover their social lives being restricted associated to the reminder that they’ve a life limiting sickness that may be a painful psychological reminder of the poor prognosis of a GBM (Bennett, et al, 2016)
\n\u2022 Speedy analysis and illness development leaves little time to consolidate and put together for demise – non secular wants should be thought-about
\n\u2022 Was an ample ache scale used?
\n\u2022 A fast decline like Frank’s doesn’t give the affected person nor the household time to organize, are there some other interventions that might have been thought-about to help Frank’s household after his demise ?
\n\u2022 How can Frank’s household be supplied assist and persevering with bereavement follow-up ?
\n\u2022 Take into account the ample and detailed use of the SAS software
\n\u2022 Is there something that might have been completed to make sure that Frank had his dexamethasone to help together with his raised ICP?
\n\u2022 Does Frank have a proper to refuse therapy ? Was he competent to make this determination?
\n\u2022 What can nursing employees present households and the deceased affected person to assist them of their grief, loss and must say goodbye?
\n\u2022 Are the Nationwide palliative Care requirements thought-about within the CPG?
\n\u2022 Have been the NMBA and NQHS requirements thought-about within the CPG?
\n\u2022 Can the CPG be improved in any option to help its affiliation with care planning, evaluation instruments and care supplied within the palliative setting?
\n\u2022 What’s your accountability as an RN to know the illness trajectory of your affected person’s, plan their care and the care of their cherished one’s by way of the information of nursing requirements?
\nTake into account these factors and the numerous others that you could have additionally considered you mirrored on Frank’s quick and aggressive journey with a GBM diagnosi
\nMedical Apply Tips
\nCPG’s
\nWhat are they?
\nWhy are they vital?
\nHow do they assist us to keep up excessive ranges of care?
\nWill we enhance our care by reflection and updating CPG’s by way of proof Based mostly analysis?
\nFrank’s Case Research
\nAs described within the Unit Define you are actually required to:
\n\u2022 Three CPG’s are on the LEO tile choose ONE of the Medical Apply Tips supplied on the Evaluation LEO tile
\n\u2022 Two of those CPG’s are right for this case research while one is NOT (Choosing the proper CPG as per standards three of the Rubric) is crucial throughout the office.
\n\u2022 The CPG’s to pick from are:
\no Care of the Dying affected person
\no Organ and Tissue Donation
\no Managing Psychological Points inclusive of Terminal Restlessness
\n\u2022 Evaluate and critique the care given to Frank in opposition to the CPG you will have chosen and offering proof to assist your critique by way of different extra analysis that you’ll undertake
\n\u2022 Spotlight the significance of the numerous requirements and the way they affect our observe
\no NSQHSS and\/or
\no NMBA requirements and\/or
\no Palliative Care requirements
\n\u2022 Reveal information on the sickness trajectory of a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) in step with palliative Care ideas
\n\u2022 Present hyperlinks between the case research and your chosen CPG to determine highlights or limitations in care
\n\u2022 The place any areas of the CPG omitted within the care?
\n\u2022 Do you imagine that the CPG requires updating? If that’s the case assist with modern literature
\n\u2022 Be certain that your sources are all modern (throughout the final 5 years) and from proof primarily based sources)
\n\u2022 Learn all directions and the rubric very fastidiously
\n\u2022 PLEASE NOTE, YOU DO NOT NEED TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE POINTS ABOVE IN YOUR ESSAY. THESE ARE GIVEN TO YOU TO ENVOKE THOUGHT PROCESS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NRSG374 Unit Define Evaluation Activity 2 Particulars College students are to supply an 1800 phrase critique of the supplied case research utilizing solely ONE CPG.\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2474,2482,2483],"tags":[2368,2479,2477,2485,2476,1481,2475,2484,2478],"class_list":["post-6769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psyc-essays","category-psyc-paper-writing-service","category-psychology-dissertation-writing-service","tag-masters-essays","tag-psyc","tag-psychology-assignment","tag-psychology-case-study","tag-psychology-dissertations","tag-psychology-essays","tag-psychology-research-papers","tag-psychology-thesis","tag-sociology-essays"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}