NRSG374 Unit Define Evaluation Process 2 Particulars
\nCollege students are to supply an 1800 phrase critique of the supplied case research utilizing solely ONE CPG.
\nTo finish this activity you’ll need to debate and critique related components of the CPG and case research while upholding:
\n\u2022 NSQHS and\/or
\n\u2022 NMBA requirements and\/or
\n\u2022 Nationwide Palliative Care requirements
\nFAQ’s
\nDo we have to use all of those requirements to do nicely?
\n\u2022 Because the rubric states for those who present -Excellent information of themes and rules related to palliative care- this may show an excellent utility of your information to apply due to this fact utilizing requirements from greater than one of many above and relating them collectively to uphold your critique of the affected person care and assist the scientific apply guideline chosen will show wonderful information and understanding. Utilizing one commonplace from one of many above won’t present sturdy utility of information. Nevertheless, a comparability of a number of requirements that as registered nurses we’re required to uphold will completely show very sturdy information and understanding, for those who hyperlink them collectively nicely with proof primarily based apply (EBP)
\nThe place do I discover all of those requirements?
\nYou need to be conscious of all the requirements above as they’ve been mentioned in lots of items all through your diploma, so now it’s time to show your information and produce them collectively. to help you We have now supplied hyperlinks under to every of the requirements we want you to utilise in your critique.
\nNSQHS
\nEight Nationwide security and High quality Well being Service Requirements to supply a nationally constant degree of care that may be anticipated by all customers from all well being organisations
\nhttps:\/\/www.safetyandquality.gov.au\/requirements\/nsqhs-standards
\nNMBA
\nSeven Requirements that every one Registered nurses should uphold to make sure that they preserve their registration and supply individual centred and proof primarily based preventative, healing, supportive, formative and palliative components to their apply
\nhttps:\/\/www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au\/Codes-Tips-Statements\/Skilled-standards\/registered-nurse-standards-for-practice.aspx
\nNationwide Palliative Care Requirements
\n9 Nationwide palliative Care requirements that you understand nicely as they’ve fashioned the framework of NRSG374 and had been basic for evaluation activity 1
\nhttps:\/\/palliativecare.org.au\/requirements
\nHow do I relate these requirements to Frank’s experiences as a affected person?
\nThat is the place your crucial pondering and utility of concept to apply is required, we can’t let you know how to do that, as a remaining 12 months nursing unit is important that you’re conscious of how all of those requirements, uphold and preserve, affected person centred care, dignity, affected person evaluation and security to call a number of. Spend a while reviewing these and map out those that you simply consider are necessary to your critique.
\nDue date: 14\/10\/2020 1600 hours
\nWeighting: 50%
\nSize and\/or format: 1800 phrases +\/- 10%
\nObjective: College students are required to show an understanding of how concept interprets into sensible nursing care and the way proof underpins finest apply. Every scholar will evaluate and critique the care given within the Case Examine supplied in response to their selection of ONLY ONE of the supplied Scientific Apply Tips (CPG\u2019s) finest suited to the highlighted dialogue.
\nThe place will I discover the CPG’s that you really want me to make use of?
\nYou might be supplied with CPG’s for this activity, you want to select certainly one of these solely to show the world of care that you’re offering a critique of. You do NOT must search for different CPG’s to assist your work, nonetheless proof primarily based apply of peer reviewed journal publications are anticipated to additional reinforce your critique.
\nStudying outcomes assessed: LO1, LO5, LO7
\nThe right way to submit: Digital Submission through Turnitin
\nReturn of project: The evaluation suggestions and grade will probably be returned through Turnitin.
\nEvaluation standards: The evaluation will probably be marked utilizing the criteria-based rubric. Please notice that in-text citations are included within the phrase rely while the reference checklist just isn’t included within the phrase rely. Phrases which are greater than 10% over the phrase rely won’t be thought-about
\nRubric – might be discovered within the unit define in Appendix B
\nHyperlink to the unit define under (have to be logged in to LEO entry this)
\nhttps:\/\/leo.acu.edu.au\/pluginfile.php\/4187239\/mod_resource\/content material\/11\/NRSG374%20Unit%20Define%20.pdf
\nThink about the Affected person State of affairs<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nFortunato (Frank) Rossi, is a 60 12 months outdated male who was born in Italy and Migrated to Australia along with his spouse in 1952, each he and his 58 12 months outdated spouse Sofia have twin citizenship in Italy and Australia. Frank and his spouse apply a powerful catholic religion. Frank has labored as a Secondary College Science and Arithmetic instructor at a neighborhood Catholic Secondary College for over 20 years and loves his job. He’s nicely revered by his colleagues and college students along with his very -quick wit and sharp thoughts with downside solving- that he prides himself on
\nSofia has been a keep at residence mom and carer for his or her 2 daughters:
\n\u2022 Eldest Daughter: Anna married Phillip have 2 daughters Bella (6) and Emily (three months)
\n\u2022 Youngest Daughter: Gabriella married Michael have 1 son (18 months outdated)
\nCollectively they’ve had an exquisite life, with supportive household visiting from Italy and the Rossi household themselves having the ability to go over to Italy for a lot of household holidays. Each Frank and Sofia are very excited and having fun with being grandparents, they’re trying ahead to Frank’s choice for an early ‘self funded retirement’ to get pleasure from extra time with the household. Frank has organized along with his college to have the ability to undertake a small quantity of informal educating if he and his household require some small revenue as soon as he has retired, though he’s very eager to work in his backyard and spend time serving to to lift the grandchildren and benefit from the a few years of arduous work that he and Sofia put in to assist their household and the -good life- they’ve created in Australia.
\nThree months in the past
\nFrank skilled some confusion at work and a seizure -of unknown origin- that was witnessed by his spouse and grandchildren. Sofia instantly known as 000 and Frank was transported urgently below the care of paramedics to the emergency division (ED) of a significant metropolitan hospital as they lived near the town.
\nAcquire Cues and Info<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones 2018)<\/p>\n
Previous Medical Hx
\n\u2022 Tonsillectomy as a toddler
\n\u2022 Ex smoker (give up smoking 25 years in the past was a packet a day smoker)
\n\u2022 Eating regimen Managed sort 2 Diabetes
\nPresent Historical past
\n\u2022 Seizures of unknown origin
\n\u2022 Confusion
\n\u2022 Headache
\n\u2022 Blurred imaginative and prescient
\n\u2022 Difficulties with downside fixing and choice making
\n\u2022 Gradual onset of speech disturbance
\n\u2022 Muscle Weak spot
\n\u2022 Behaviour Adjustments
\n\u2022 Vomiting
\n\u2022 Sleepiness
\n\u2022 sluggish pupil response to gentle
\nGathering new Info
\nFrank’s important indicators upon admission to medical ward
\nRR : 18
\nHR: 84 bpm
\nBP: 185\/95
\nSaO2: 96% on 3Lmin through N\/P (For Consolation measures)
\nRaised Intracranial Strain (ICP) – fixed headache
\nGCS – 9\/15 (eyes open to painful stimuli 2 \/ confused and disorientated verbal response Four \/ Irregular Flexion from painful stimuli three)
\nIntermittent Affected person Notes
\n-Affected person transferred to medical ward following noticed seizure of unknown origin by spouse and grandchildren who known as 000 for paramedic assist. In ED affected person’s acutely aware state was altered with confusion and lack of ability to recognise wife-
\n-Pupil dimension of each eyes was equal nonetheless pupillary gentle reflex is sluggish, optimistic babinski signal response bilaterally, renal operate regular, affected person experiencing double incontinence, regular FBE and U&E-
\n-Preliminary MRI clearly confirmed abnormalities within the frontal and temporal areas, with a differential analysis of metastatic tumors within the mind from an unknown primary-
\nFrank was experiencing Elevated Intracranial Strain possible from mind lesions and doable Prognosis of a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)
\nDifferential Diagnoses had not but been dominated out
\n-Affected person was administered mannitol each 12\/24 over 16 days to cut back Intra Cranial Strain (ICP,) Lyrica 150mg BD for seizure exercise, and Diazepam 10mg PRN….. 5 days publish preliminary seizure pt woke with regular cognitive responses and recognition of relations as soon as ICP had begun to cut back. Progressively pt’s skill to stroll with out deficit returned. Pt was absolutely continent, had good long run reminiscence recollection, nonetheless quick time period reminiscence was impacted-
\n-Pt’s oral mucosa had a number of abrasions and thrush evident from doable harm throughout seizure, affected person complained of mouth and throat ache, typically refusing to eat and drink-
\n-Differential Diagnoses of ?An infection, ?metastaic cerebral tumors had been mentioned nonetheless following lumbar puncture for assortment of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) specimen, and additional MRI outcomes displaying speedy tumor development notably in Frank’s frontal lobe simply 18 days after his preliminary ED presentation, the analysis was extremely indicative of a GBM-
\n-Affected person and spouse agreed to surgical tumor resection as a palliative measure with the information that this was not a treatment. Histopathology publish surgical resection clearly recognized a quickly rising GBM with temporal lobe metastases because the definitive analysis. A household assembly was organized with the neurosurgeon, oncologist, palliative guide, social employee, nurse unit supervisor, Frank and his household to debate options-
\nConfirmed Prognosis, medical imaging and histopathology outcomes
\nFollowing CT Mind and MRI it was concluded that Frank had a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) in his frontal lobe which had possible metastasized in each temporal lobes, thus his prognosis was devastatingly a Stage IV GBM with a possible survival of two – three months with out surgical resection and\/or palliative radiation remedy.
\n-Household suggested to debate and full an Superior Care Directive while Frank was competent with the information that his ICP was more likely to enhance once more, and a call on learn how to proceed with interventions was wanted. Palliative radiotherapy was provided to Frank, he and his spouse refused and determined to be transferred to an inpatient palliative care unit nearer to their household the place he might go residence on day visits and likewise spend extra time along with his household on the palliative care unit, somewhat than in a busy medical ward-
\nWhile on Day depart Frank had one other seizure and was transferred again to the Normal Ward for evaluate \u2026..Frank has now spent a while in a normal medical ward on the Tertiary Degree Metropolis Hospital that he was initially transferred to by ambulance 2 weeks in the past following one other seizure while he was at residence throughout a go to there from the palliative care unit. Throughout his re-admission the next cues and data had been collected and a analysis made. Previous to his switch and re- admission again to the palliative care unit in an outer metropolis hospital nearer to his household residence
\nProcessing Info<\/p>\n
Arrival and Admission to the Palliative Care Unit
\nFrank expressed some private household historical past and needs for his illness development
\n-Frank knowledgeable medical and nursing employees that his father had died from a GBM, stressed, undignified crawling on the ground from terminal restlessness and his solely want was to not die like his father had-
\n-Nil Superior Care Directive had been accomplished with Frank and Sofia as they thought they nonetheless had loads of time when knowledgeable about an ACD on the Medical Ward. Nevertheless, with Frank’s fluctuating ICP and disorientation he’s now deemed incompetent for any authorized choices or adjustments to his Will-
\n-Sofia was Frank’s medical Energy of Lawyer, presenting paperwork to assist this to the admitting palliative Care Crew-
\n-Sofia stayed with Frank throughout his admission and collectively they communicated that they needed him to be snug and dignified-
\nMedicines Commenced as soon as reviewed by Palliative Care Crew
\n\u2022 Dexamethasone: 8mg BD oral or S\/C (0800 and 1400) – To help in discount of ICP and Ache Reduction from headache (Think about uncomfortable side effects and behavioural adjustments from dexamethasone – How can these be managed?)
\n\u2022 Lyrica : 75mg BD Oral (0800 and 2000) – To handle seizure exercise (take into account uncomfortable side effects of Lyrica, are there different choices that could possibly be thought-about for Frank?)
\n\u2022 MS Contin 10mg BD Oral (0800 and 2000hrs) – Analgesia
\nPRN Medicines
\n\u2022 Morphine 5-10mg S\/C
\n\u2022 Midazolam 2.5-5mg s\/c
\n\u2022 Ondansetron 8mg wafer (most dose of 16mg in 24 hours ) for nausea and vomiting
\nUpon arrival and admission to the palliative care unit the next referrals had been made
\n\u2022 Physiotherapist evaluate for evaluation of strolling help as a result of growing parasethsia and weak point in Frank’s legs
\n\u2022 OT residence evaluation and tools for residence visits
\n\u2022 Dietician to evaluate lack of urge for food, cachexia and anorexia
\n\u2022 Pastoral care
\n\u2022 Catholic Priest visits and want to be anointed ASAP
\nFiguring out issues\/points<\/p>\n
Concerns for the Palliative Care Setting
\nFrank arrived on the Palliative Care unit late on a Sunday afternoon at 2pm, he was welcomed by his RN who undertook the next assessments and discussions between him, his spouse and two daughters:
\n\u2022 Welcome and orientation to the ward
\n\u2022 Falls Danger Evaluation
\n\u2022 Braden Strain Danger Evaluation
\n\u2022 Ache Evaluation
\n\u2022 Allied Well being Referrals made
\n\u2022 NOK contact particulars
\n\u2022 Modified Karnofsky Rating of 40-50
\n\u2022 RUG- ADL 10+
\n\u2022 SAS Software Partially Accomplished 5 of the 7 signs solely (deliberate to debate fatigue and bowel points tomorrow as affected person was sleepy and Sofia had gone residence to get garments and are available again to sleep the evening on the palliative care unit
\n\u2022 Palliative Care Section – -Deteriorating-
\nWhat may be some issues I want to think about as an RN caring for Frank and his household ?
\n\u2022 Nationwide Palliative Care Requirements ?
\n\u2022 NSQHS Requirements?
\n\u2022 NMBA Requirements?
\n\u2022 What do I learn about GBM sickness Trajectory?
\n\u2022 How will I recall info on GBM?
\n\u2022 The place are a few of the finest areas to entry EBP on GBM and present requirements of care?
\n\u2022 What’s my position in supporting Frank’s spouse and household?
\n\u2022 What’s a SAS Software?
\n\u2022 What’s the Issues Severity Rating\/ (PSS)
\n\u2022 What’s a Modified karnofsky Rating?
\n\u2022 What’s a RUG-ADL Rating?
\n\u2022 How do I decide the Palliative Care Section that the affected person is in?
\n\u2022 Do I want to start out having some troublesome conversations and ask Frank and his spouse what they perceive about his prognosis?
\n\u2022 What a few of the issues that Frank could face?
\n\u2022 Are there any particular signs that I ought to be searching for when growing Frank’s care plan?
\n\u2022 What’s the pathophysiological response when somebody dies from a GBM?
\n\u2022 What ought to I anticipate?
\n\u2022 Am I able to take care of this?
\n\u2022 The place do I get assist as an RN if i really feel overwhelmed?
\n\u2022 Have I believed sufficient about my very own nicely being and resilience for this skilled soeciality?
\n\u2022 How do I take care of a deceased individual?
\n\u2022 How will I do know what to say?
\nstablishing Objectives and Taking Motion<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nMonday Morning
\nThroughout handover the day after Frank was admitted to the Palliative Care Unit we’re informed that he had a fall in a single day making an attempt to get to the bathroom and have become confused as he was unable to void, telling the nursing employees that his -feet felt numb-.
\nFrank was reviewed by the Night time Normal Medical Registrar who in session with the Urology Registrar determined to insert an IDC into Frank as on the bladder scan it confirmed that he had 800 mls in his bladder, and was in apparent discomfort from urinary retention. Throughout this process the medical and nursing employees gave Frank a breakthrough of s\/c morphine 5mg to help along with his discomfort. He had a full neurological evaluation with decrease limb weak point evident, nonetheless nil pores and skin tears, breaks or lacerations to the physique or head. Frank appeared barely confused, though was oriented to put and individual.
\nFrank was despatched for additional scans within the morning displaying spinal metastases and a quickly advancing spinal wire compression, which are thought-about uncommon however seen in circumstances of GBM. Spinal wire compression in these circumstances are referred to as drop metastasis whereby mobile unfold throughout the sub-arachnoid area travels throughout the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) onto the precise backbone as an impact of gravity often settling and rising within the decrease thoracic and higher lumbar backbone areas (Shripad, et al, 2015).
\nSpeaking with Frank and his spouse
\nFrank and his household are devastated by the information of the speedy development and the information that he’s shedding extra independence with an lack of ability to stroll, and management his urinary and faecal continence. Frank turns into very withdrawn and refuses to take his treatment and eat.
\n(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nWednesday Afternoon
\nThe afternoon shift nurse walked in to introduce herself and located Frank alone as his spouse had left solely half an hour in the past, his respiration is brief, shallow and laboured, with a respiratory fee of 6, Frank is aggitated and making an attempt to crawl off the bed, eradicating his garments and pulling out is S\/C breakthrough Intima’s (s\/c butterfly).
\nThe Palliative Care Crew evaluate Frank and recognise indicators and signs of terminal restlessness possible from an inreased ICP and ongoing illness development. Frank’s spouse known as and knowledgeable of his sudden alteration in behaviour and suggested that a syringe driver was required to be commenced as his refusal to take his oral treatment notably his dexamethasone could have contributed to this cerebral oedema. Sofia agrees to subcutaneous treatment being commences as she promised him when his father was dying that she would do no matter she might to verify he died with dignity and respect. Sofia started making her means again to the Palliative Care Unit together with her household.
\nEvaluating and Figuring out new issues<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nWednesday Night
\nFrank has been unresponsive, and experiencing intervals of apnoea since earlier this afternoon. He has been commenced on a syringe driver containing dexamethasone, morphine and midazolam. Frank has not spoken to his household since they arrived nor has he held or squeezed Sofia’s hand.
\nFrank is now absolutely mattress sure thus his Modified Karnofsky Rating is 10, with him now within the -Terminal- Palliaitve Care Section.
\nFrank is on a stress mattress, and is being turned each 2-Four hours or when exhibiting sounds or indicators of moaning or restlessness to keep up consolation and pores and skin integrity, this takes x2 nursing employees to carry out this care, together with full mouth care as he’s now longer consuming or ingesting.Frank’s RUG-ADL complete is now 18<\/p>\n
Wednesday Night time \/ Early Thursday Morning
\nAll through the evening Frank’s household stays by his facet listening to his -rattly breathing-, nursing employees place Frank backward and forward frequently somewhat than on his again to make sure that terminal secretions drain from his mouth, he’s administered PRN doses of glycopyrroalate S\/C as an anticholinergic agent to help in extreme secretions and attempt to ease his work of respiration.
\nAt 0215 hours Frank’s intervals of apnoea started to vary to Cheyne-Stoking upon examination Frank’s pupils had turn into mounted and dilated, he was cyanosed round his mouth, on his fingers, toes and knees. Frank’s household was with him within the room when inside a number of quick minutes he ceased respiration and died. His dying was a lot sooner than his household had anticipated leaving employees to assist them and clarify the outcomes of raised ICP and mind herniation into the mind stem, that may happen with a GBM analysis.
\nReflection<\/p>\n
(Levett-Jones, 2018)
\nHigh quality of Life Concerns
\nThink about a few of the following as you choose one of many scientific apply pointers equipped within the assessments folder to help you with working by Frank’s analysis, surgical preparation and transfer to the palliative care setting all in a matter of weeks from the time he was identified with a terminal sickness from being at a stage in his life that he had labored for to retire and luxuriate in his household.
\n\u2022 Complications are multifactorial for affected person’s with a GBM inflicting not solely bodily ache however social, psychological and emotional points as they discover their social lives being restricted associated to the reminder that they’ve a life limiting sickness that may be a painful psychological reminder of the poor prognosis of a GBM (Bennett, et al, 2016)
\n\u2022 Fast analysis and illness development leaves little time to consolidate and put together for dying – non secular wants have to be thought-about
\n\u2022 Was an ample ache scale used?
\n\u2022 A speedy decline like Frank’s doesn’t give the affected person nor the household time to arrange, are there another interventions that would have been thought-about to help Frank’s household after his dying ?
\n\u2022 How can Frank’s household be supplied assist and persevering with bereavement follow-up ?
\n\u2022 Think about the ample and detailed use of the SAS instrument
\n\u2022 Is there something that would have been accomplished to make sure that Frank had his dexamethasone to help along with his raised ICP?
\n\u2022 Does Frank have a proper to refuse remedy ? Was he competent to make this choice?
\n\u2022 What can nursing employees present households and the deceased affected person to help them of their grief, loss and have to say goodbye?
\n\u2022 Are the Nationwide palliative Care requirements thought-about within the CPG?
\n\u2022 Had been the NMBA and NQHS requirements thought-about within the CPG?
\n\u2022 Can the CPG be improved in any approach to help its affiliation with care planning, evaluation instruments and care supplied within the palliative setting?
\n\u2022 What’s your accountability as an RN to grasp the illness trajectory of your affected person’s, plan their care and the care of their liked one’s by the information of nursing requirements?
\nThink about these factors and the various others that you’ll have additionally considered you mirrored on Frank’s quick and aggressive journey with a GBM diagnosi
\nScientific Apply Tips
\nCPG’s
\nWhat are they?
\nWhy are they necessary?
\nHow do they assist us to keep up excessive ranges of care?
\nWill we enhance our care by reflection and updating CPG’s by proof Based mostly analysis?
\nFrank’s Case Examine
\nAs described within the Unit Define you are actually required to:
\n\u2022 Three CPG’s are on the LEO tile choose ONE of the Scientific Apply Tips supplied on the Evaluation LEO tile
\n\u2022 Two of those CPG’s are appropriate for this case research while one is NOT (Deciding on the proper CPG as per standards three of the Rubric) is important throughout the office.
\n\u2022 The CPG’s to pick from are:
\no Care of the Dying affected person
\no Organ and Tissue Donation
\no Managing Psychological Points inclusive of Terminal Restlessness
\n\u2022 Evaluation and critique the care given to Frank towards the CPG you have got chosen and offering proof to assist your critique by different extra analysis that you’ll undertake
\n\u2022 Spotlight the significance of the various requirements and the way they affect our apply
\no NSQHSS and\/or
\no NMBA requirements and\/or
\no Palliative Care requirements
\n\u2022 Show information on the sickness trajectory of a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) according to palliative Care rules
\n\u2022 Present hyperlinks between the case research and your chosen CPG to establish highlights or limitations in care
\n\u2022 The place any areas of the CPG omitted within the care?
\n\u2022 Do you consider that the CPG requires updating? If that’s the case assist with up to date literature
\n\u2022 Make sure that your sources are all up to date (throughout the final 5 years) and from proof primarily based sources)
\n\u2022 Learn all directions and the rubric very rigorously
\n\u2022 PLEASE NOTE, YOU DO NOT NEED TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE POINTS ABOVE IN YOUR ESSAY. THESE ARE GIVEN TO YOU TO ENVOKE THOUGHT PROCESS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NRSG374 Unit Define Evaluation Process 2 Particulars College students are to supply an 1800 phrase critique of the supplied case research utilizing solely ONE CPG.\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2474,2482,2483],"tags":[2368,2479,2477,2485,2476,1481,2475,2484,2478],"class_list":["post-6823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psyc-essays","category-psyc-paper-writing-service","category-psychology-dissertation-writing-service","tag-masters-essays","tag-psyc","tag-psychology-assignment","tag-psychology-case-study","tag-psychology-dissertations","tag-psychology-essays","tag-psychology-research-papers","tag-psychology-thesis","tag-sociology-essays"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6823"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6823\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/homeworkacetutors.com\/nursing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}