In this week’s PP I highlighted three discussions from Plato’s Crito (Parent, Benefactor, Tacit Agreement). After lection the Crito, delight confirmance perfect of the following:
(A) Which of these discussions do you invent most convincing?
(B) Choose undivided discussion and propose at last undivided argue in living of it (i.e. Why ability a argueable special confirm it?).
(C) Raise an hindrance to that selfselfsame discussion (to a point march in that discussion), preamble concern to represent your hindrance collectively.
(D) This week, I’d affect you to tally to another student’s support (if you are undivided of the primitive to support, you may want to inhibit end in with the board this weekend). Your rejoinder should be about the resigned of the support, as contrariant to “Hey, I affect your support!” (though you can surely allege that also).
lection site： http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/crito.html