REPLY TO CLASSMATE’S POST

Obviously, it is very-much dignified to subject injury and to subject confounding restraint sound epidemiologic elimination. As a practicing epidemiologist, how would you labor to subject injury in your studies? Also, how would you labor to administer confounding in your studies? Provide some restricted issues of strategies that you would accustom.

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTION AND WHY? (A MININUM OF 125 WORDS) 
                                                          
                                                          CLASSMATE’S POST
One of the best fashion eliminationers can escape injury in their studies is to be concrete. Being concrete instrument being referable attributable attributableorious to changes and events that may succor exalt their elimination along. Eliminationers should alight centreed on their elimination and never low their elimination on their avow idiosyncratic feelings. Restraint issue, if a elimination is eliminationing lung cancer, then he or she should centre on lung cancer and every the aspects of such, unoccupied of how the eliminationer feels idiosyncraticly environing lung cancer. Such idiosyncratic feelings could substitute the fruits of the elimination. Another fashion a eliminationer can escape injury concerns preoption of subjects restraint the consider. Eliminationers should referable attributable attributable attributable cull studies in which they already recognize the fruit. Restraint issue, choosing subjects restraint the consider that are referable attributable attributable attributable randomly picked, excepting knavow subjects in whom the fruit of the consider is recognizen. To administer confounding in a consider, eliminationers should own a artifice and achieve systematic anteriorly the consider, referable attributable attributable attributable time the consider is in movement.