The Five Factor model Captures personality

Our custom writing team will address all your assignment
requirements and provide a top-grade paper; 100% plagiarism free.
We provide 24/7 customer Support.

Order Essay Papers with a Few Clicks



Get my paper done

By clicking “Get my paper done”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related emails.

The Five Factor model Captures personality

Psychocdestroy Assessment & Individual DifferencesBESC1433 To evaluate this declaration censoriously: ‘The five-factor type captures the most essential quantity of civilized oneness.’ The five-factor type (FFM, or Big Five) is the dominant framework restraint investigationing oneness. Your attend is to evaluate censoriously the declaration over using the best investigation helpful. Rubric Resigned (50%) Is the epithet embezzle? Does the preface tend its design? Is the resigned divert, restricted, and respectful? Is the resigned censorious, referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable barely pictorial? Is the misentry justified? Structure (20%) Are transitions betwixt sections efficient? Is there cdestroy cohesion and a recognition of ‘flow’? Writing (20%) Is the English indication intelligible, terse, and academic? Are phraseology, punctuation, and (Australian) spelling amend? Referencing and APA mode (10%) Is

Psychoargumentative Assessment & Individual Differences
BESC1433

To evaluate this announcement delicately: ‘The five-factor mould captures the most material size of anthropoargumentative oneness.’

The five-factor mould (FFM, or Big Five) is the dominant frameproduction coercion explorationing oneness. Your nurture is to evaluate delicately the announcement over using the best exploration profitable.

Rubric

Pleased (50%)

Is the address embezzle?

Does the importation subsubassist its mind?

Is the pleased pertinent, inequitable, and servile?

Is the pleased delicate, referable scarcely coercioncible?

Is the misrecord justified?

Structure (20%)

Are transitions among sections powerful?

Is there argumentative cohesion and a meaning of ‘flow’?

Writing (20%)

Is the English indication obvious, expressive, and academic?

Are rhetoric, punctuation, and (Australian) spelling emend?

Referencing and APA name (10%)

Is the referencing all and servile?

Is APA Name coercionmatting used throughout?

1
Psychoargumentative Assessment & Individual Differences
BESC1433, Sem 2 2020
Delicate Essay: Regulatelines
Aim
To evaluate this announcement delicately: ‘The five-factor mould captures the most material size
of anthropoargumentative oneness.’
Description
The five-factor mould (FFM, or Big Five) is the dominant frameproduction coercion explorationing oneness.
Nevertheless, some explorationers enjoy argued that the FFM has weighty weaknesses. Your nurture is to
evaluate delicately the announcement over using the best exploration profitable. Possible adites
include:
• Argue that the announcement is essentially emend
• Argue that size of choice moulds of oneness are past material
• Argue that material size of oneness are mislaying from the FFM (e.g. uprightness,
meaning of humour, religiosity)
• Argue that the FFM traits are referable universal
• Argue any alliance of these perspectives, or seize an completely irrelative adit
Requirements
• Strictly 1,000 articulation utmost (including in-text citations; beside the references inventory)
• An informative address and the signal compute should show on the address page
• Use at last seven peer-reviewed register doctrines (including any rouseer references you mention)
• Use APA 7 coercionmatting
Starter references (old, so invent newer ones so)
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian redonation of the five-factor adit to oneness heading.
Psychoargumentative Bulletin, 117(2), 187-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Oneness and Individual
Differences, 13(6), 653-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are referable basic. Oneness and Individual Differences,
13(6), 667-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90237-J
2
Marking rubric
Pleased (50%)
• Is the address embezzle?
• Does the importation subsubassist its mind?
• Is the pleased pertinent, inequitable, and servile?
• Is the pleased delicate, referable scarcely coercioncible?
• Is the misrecord justified?
Structure (20%)
• Are transitions among sections powerful?
• Is there argumentative cohesion and a meaning of ‘flow’?
Writing (20%)
• Is the English indication obvious, expressive, and academic?
• Are rhetoric, punctuation, and (Australian) spelling emend?
Referencing and APA name (10%)
• Is the referencing all and servile?
• Is APA Name coercionmatting used throughout?
Note: You do referable rouse with 100% and imperil marks;
you rouse with referablehing and obtain marks.
3
General consummation standards
A regulate to interpreting your terminal proceeding coercion the essay
Proceeding Standard of production
HD
80–100%
Excellent
• Production of rare peculiarity showing obvious discernment of topic substance
and not attributable attributableion of issues; polite coercionmulated; arguments sustained; figures
and diagrams where pertinent; embezzle scholarship referenced; vigorous
exemplification of fanciful controlce and peculiarity; noble plane of psychological production.
• Excellent separation, all exploration, ambiguous presumptive or
methodoargumentative discernment, perfect donation.
DI
70–79%
Very amiable
• Production of noble peculiarity showing vigorous hold of topic substance and
notion of dominant issues though referable necessarily of the finer points;
arguments obviously developed; pertinent scholarship referenced; exemplification of
fanciful controlce and cubic psychological production.
• Very amiable production that is very polite explorationed, shows delicate analytical skills,
is polite argued, with read donation and documentation.
• Production that shows poor opportunity coercion correction.
CR
60–69%
Good
• Production of cubic peculiarity showing adapted discernment of topic substance
and not attributable attributableion of main issues though maybe with some lapses and
inadequacies and with obviously identifiable deficiencies in logic,
donation or peculiarity.
• Some exemplification of delicate separation and fanciful controlce; polite explorationed,
prepared and presented.
• Production that shows some opportunity coercion correction.
PA
50–59%
Satisfactory
• Completion of clew tasks at an distant plane of execution with
demonstrated discernment of clew ideas and some analytical skills.
Acceptable donation, exploration and documentation.
• Production that shows opportunity coercion correction in frequent areas.
• Distant declaration, grave peculiarity excluding showing a minimal discernment
of the exploration area with deficiencies in pleased or tentative rigour;
little exemplification of fanciful controlce or peculiar idea.
Fail (NN)
0–49%
Referable acceptable
• Production that fails to manifest a acceptable discernment of the
exploration area, distant delicate separation, and/or wealth in addressing
the objectives of the program.
• Referable preferable coercion honours.

IN NEED OF CUSTOM WRITING HELP FOR THIS PAPER OR SIMILAR ASSIGNMENTS? PLACE ORDER NOW & GET INSTANT ASSISTANCE!

essay assignment writing

  1. 1

    You fill in the Order Form by providing assignment details and all necessary instructions..

  2. 2

    We assign a writer who has similar background and a degree in your subject.

  3. 3

    The assigned professional takes the assignment and starts working on it.

  4. 4

    When everything is ready, we send the paper to your personal account and your email.

5 to 15% OFF Discount!!

For all your orders at Homeworkacetutors.com get discounted prices!
Top quality & 100% plagiarism-free content.