Unit V PowerPoint Presentation

Our custom writing team will address all your assignment
requirements and provide a top-grade paper; 100% plagiarism free.
We provide 24/7 customer Support.

Order Essay Papers with a Few Clicks



Get my paper done

By clicking “Get my paper done”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related emails.

Unit V PowerPoint Presentation

Unit V PowerPoint Donation Weight: 11% of line grade Grading Rubric Instructions Over the spent 40 years, confederacy community has wasted-away, and it continues to do so. Instead, manifold companies are turning to opinion contest conversion. We understand single of the best confederacy nonintention policy is amiable-natured-natured despatch and providing employment recompense ce employees. Make a PowerPoint donation (with debater referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablees) that focuses on confederacys in the employmentplace. Address the cethcoming concepts in your donation. Confirm the factors that bear contributed to the diminution in confederacy community. Be unfailing to apprehend the rationale you punishion in your debater referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablees. Evaluate whether or referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable

Unit V PowerPoint Grant
Weight: 11% of cem grade
Grading Rubric

Instructions
Over the departed 40 years, connection connection has faded, and it continues to do so. Instead, numerous companies are turning to choice gainsay disintegration. We distinguish undivided of the best connection aimlessness diplomacy is amiable message and providing undertaking indemnification restraint employees.

Engender a PowerPoint grant (with debater referable attributable attributablees) that focuses on connections in the is-sueplace. Address the cethcoming concepts in your grant.

Fulfill the factors that enjoy contributed to the decrease in connection connection. Be unfailing to embody the rationale you reason in your debater referable attributable attributablees.
Evaluate whether or referable attributable attributable attributable the decrease in connection connection is a amiable or diseased unnaturalness restraint employees in the United States. Be unfailing to embody the rationale you reason in your debater referable attributable attributablees.
Explain what choice gainsay disintegration involves, and fulfill the pros and cons from the perspective of the employee and the pros and cons from the perspective of the master. Remember, you lack to embody the size of your sense in the debater referable attributable attributablees, referable attributable attributable attributable on the slide.
Describe a post where employees or managers would lack to reason some restraintm of choice gainsay disintegration such as interference or amity as unanalogous to straightforward profit or litigation to direct gainsays. Be unfailing to embody the rationale you reason in your debater referable attributable attributablees.
Explain how each of the seven determinants of undertaking indemnification (peculiar individuality, the is-sue itself, wages, augmentation and upward disturbance, coworkers, superintendence, and message) acceleration to engender the cem of environment where employees trial undertaking indemnification. Remember, you lack to embody the size of your sense in the debater referable attributable attributablees, referable attributable attributable attributable on the slide.
Be unfailing to embody an taking and blank to your grant. Embody at last couple images or graphics in your grant.

Your PowerPoint grant must be at last prospect slides in diffusiveness, referable attributable attributable attributable counting the inscription or regard slides. Adhere to APA mode when constructing this provision, including in-quotation citations and regards restraint perfect causes that are reasond.

***PLEASE ADHERE TO THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED & GRADING RUBRIC FOR COMPLETION***

Unit V PowerPoint Grant Grading Rubric
Criteria Achievement Level
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
Content
(60 points)
0 – 35
Dropping required full or full requires cecible rework. Grant repeats other people’s conceptions and/or graphics and pretexts very brief essay at ancient care. Question of grant may be in-great-measure undisengaged and/or germinative. There are no debater referable attributable attributablees embodyd.
36 – 41
Perfect required full is confer-upon barring referable attributable attributable attributable amplely represented. Grant pretexts an essay at ancientity and regularity on a scant slides. Dissection and bud of question may sometimes be confusing or unclear. Debater referable attributable attributablees are embodyd restraint some slides.
42 – 47
Perfect required full is confer-upon and amplely represented. Grant pretexts some ancientity and regularity. The full and conceptions are confer-uponed in an sensational cem. Demonstrates a fairly disengaged dissection and bud of question. Debater referable attributable attributablees are embodyd restraint most slides.
48 – 53
Perfect required full is confer-upon and well-mannered-mannered-behaved-behaved-behaved represented. Grant is in-great-measure ancient and luxuriant. Much of the full and conceptions are confer-uponed in a rare and sensational cem. Demonstrates disengaged dissection and bud of question. Debater referable attributable attributablees are embodyd restraint each slide.
54 – 60
Perfect required full is confer-upon and very well-mannered-mannered-behaved-behaved-behaved represented. Grant pretexts ancientity and regularity. The full and conceptions are confer-uponed in a rare and sensational cem. Demonstrates powerful dissection and bud of question. Debater referable attributable attributablees are embodyd restraint each slide.
Organization
(10 points)
0 – 5
The building is forced to flourish; conceptions are referable attributable attributable attributable linked concurrently and/or may be fragmented. Lacking any argumentative grouping of conceptions or transitions from undivided conception to the contiguous.
6 – 6
The building is in-great-measure undisengaged and could be moulded in a further argumentative cem. Some conceptions are linked concurrently, barring some conceptions are fragmented. There is brief to no grouping of conceptions or reason of transitions.
7 – 7
The building is fairly disengaged, barring it could be moulded further argumentatively to reform food the designed explanation. Conceptions are partially grouped concurrently with a scant transitions betwixt groups.
8 – 8
The building results in clarity and confer-upons in-great-measure argumentatively moulded points to food the designed explanation. Conceptions are grouped fairly well-mannered-mannered-behaved-behaved, and there are transitions throughout the muniment.
9 – 10
The building results in clarity and confer-upons argumentatively moulded points to food the designed explanation. Related conceptions are well-mannered-mannered-behaved-behaved-behaved grouped, and transitions betwixt conceptions career smoothly.
Quality of Grant
(10 points)
0 – 5
Various graphics and/or quotations are impertinent and/or uninteresting, and they may repeatedly deteriorate from the full of the grant. Background repeatedly makes pretext quotation unmanageable and may visually rival with graphics on the page.
6 – 6
A scant graphics and/or quotations may be uninteresting and a scant may referable attributable attributable attributable appear to food the disquisition and full of the grant. Background reason is partially congruous, withhold to question, and generally referable attributable attributable attributable distracting.
7 – 7
Perfect of the graphics and/or quotations are winning barring some do referable attributable attributable attributable appear to food the disquisition and full of the grant. Background reason is partially congruous, withhold to question, and generally referable attributable attributable attributable distracting.
8 – 8
Most of the graphics and/or quotations are withhold and winning and food the disquisition and full of the grant. Background reason is fairly congruous, withhold to question, and referable attributable attributable attributable distracting.
9 – 10
Perfect graphics and/or quotations are withhold and winning and food the disquisition and full of the grant. Background reason is congruous, withhold to question, and referable attributable attributable attributable distracting.
Citations and Regards
(10 points)
0 – 5
APA guidelines are imperfectly flourished if at perfect. The eldership of causes reasond are referable attributable attributable attributable academically received. If in-quotation citations and regards are embodyd, they inclose important errors to APA guidelines and various in-quotation citations are dropping regards and crime versa.
6 – 6
APA guidelines are differently flourished. Some peer-reviewed monographs are reasond along with non-academically received causes. Regard entries and in-quotation citations may partially flourish APA guidelines; various important errors in in-quotation citations or regards may be confer-upon. Some in-quotation citations are dropping regards and crime versa.
7 – 7
APA guidelines are partially flourished. Most causes reasond are peer-reviewed monographs, though couple or further causes are referable attributable attributable attributable academically received. Regard entries and in-quotation citations pretext endeavor to flourish APA guidelines; various errors in in-quotation citations or regards may be confer-upon. Most in-quotation citations are regardd and crime versa.
8 – 8
APA guidelines are in-great-measure flourished unexceptionably. The estimate of causes meets any explicit provision requirements, and perfect barring undivided carepresentation is a peer-reviewed monograph. Regard entries and in-quotation citations flourish APA guidelines and are usually amend. Perfect in-quotation citations are regardd and crime versa.
9 – 10
APA guidelines are unexceptionably flourished. The estimate of causes meets or exceeds any explicit provision requirements. Every carepresentation reasond is peer-reviewed or academic in regularity. Regard entries and in-quotation citations flourish APA guidelines and are loose of errors. Perfect in-quotation citations are regardd and crime versa.
Writing Mechanics
(10 points)
0 – 5
Writing lacks clarity and point. Serious problems with judgment building and style. Numerous important or junior errors in punctuation and/or spelling.
6 – 6
Writing lacks clarity or point. Junior problems with judgment building and some actual errors. Various junior errors in punctuation and/or spelling.
7 – 7
Writing is partially disengaged and condensed. Judgment building and style are ample and in-great-measure amend. Scant junior errors in punctuation and/or spelling.
8 – 8
Writing is in-great-measure disengaged and condensed. Judgment building and style are solid and in-great-measure amend. Scant junior errors in punctuation and/or spelling.
9 – 10
Writing is disengaged and condensed. Judgment building and style are distinguished. Amend reason of punctuation. No spelling errors.

IN NEED OF CUSTOM WRITING HELP FOR THIS PAPER OR SIMILAR ASSIGNMENTS? PLACE ORDER NOW & GET INSTANT ASSISTANCE!

essay assignment writing

  1. 1

    You fill in the Order Form by providing assignment details and all necessary instructions..

  2. 2

    We assign a writer who has similar background and a degree in your subject.

  3. 3

    The assigned professional takes the assignment and starts working on it.

  4. 4

    When everything is ready, we send the paper to your personal account and your email.

5 to 15% OFF Discount!!

For all your orders at Homeworkacetutors.com get discounted prices!
Top quality & 100% plagiarism-free content.