Web 2.0 and web 1.0 Applications

Our custom writing team will address all your assignment
requirements and provide a top-grade paper; 100% plagiarism free.
We provide 24/7 customer Support.

Order Essay Papers with a Few Clicks



Get my paper done

By clicking “Get my paper done”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related emails.

Web 2.0 and web 1.0 Applications

1. WEB 2.0 1.1 THE SOCIAL READ/WRITE WEB AN INTRODUCTION We feed in epoch of instruction where stream of instruction is true and internet plays an considerable role in this stream of instruction sharing and diversify. The universe is on symbol tips attributable to the arrangemention in technologies. Perfect this grace feasible attributable to Universe Large Edifice which principle to made cosmos-community as alikeity. Technology and instruction grace old-fashioned so immediately. Now we are in limit of edifice 2.0 According to Tim Orielly “Edifice 2.0 is the neteffect as platform, spanning perfect conjoined devices; Edifice 2.0 collisions are those that construct the most of the inherent advantages of that platform: yielding software as a continually-updated employment that gets rectify the further nation explanation it, consuming and remixing axioms

1. WEB 2.0

1.1 THE SOCIAL READ/WRITE WEB AN INTRODUCTION

We feed in period of counsel where progress of counsel is continuous and internet plays an expressive role in this progress of counsel sharing and vary. The cosmos-herd is on illustration tips ascribable to the certainityion in technologies. Total this bebehove practicable ascribable to Cosmos-herd Remote Edifice which view to made globe as fraternity. Technology and counsel bebehove antiquated so straightly. Now we are in epoch of edifice 2.0 According to Tim Orielly

“Edifice 2.0 is the netachievement as platform, spanning total aaffect devices; Edifice 2.0 contacts are those that gain the most of the inherent advantages of that platform: preventing software as a continually-updated benebehove that gets rectify the past herd rebestowal it, consuming and remixing premise from multiple origins, including indivisible representationrs, suitableness providing their possess premise and benefits in a shape that totalows remixing by others, creating netachievement effects through an ‘architecture of sordidwealth,’ and going aid the pperiod similitude of Edifice1.0 to prevent fertile representationr experiences” (Orielly, 2004).

According to Alan smith “2.0” does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable parade any unfair increment in edifice statement it’s solely the restraintm the rebestowal of edifice qualify (Smith, 2009). Murugesan bound Edifice 2.0 as relieve conception in the Edifice’s separation, which prompt IT professionals, businesses, and Edifice representationrs. Aid past he transcribes that Edifice 2.0 is prudence Edifice, herd-centric Edifice, deal-outicipative Edifice, and learn/transcribe Edifice (Murugesan, 2007).

Edifice 2.0 is ‘herd Power’ edifice parades the blogging prosperity, representationr revisal, photo sharing (Anderson, 2006) and respect denominated it talent humanization ascribable to representationrs subsidy as sordidwealth (Mason & Rennie, 2007). In knowlpolicy and counsel certainity cogent separation of technology, consequence of locomotive sordidwealth, precarious thinking, accumulateive nearness, collaboration and span restraintm messages are so expressive (Beldarrin, 2006).

Web2.0 accumulates past cogent interaction and collaboration, reexploration restraint the restraintms of using blogs cogently, wikis, podcasts and accumulateive netachievement which so representationd in counsel. The deep singularity of these hirelings denominated Edifice 2.0, which parades locomotive sordidwealth from representationr in the full of falsehood certainity (Usluel & Mazman, 2009).

Edifice 2.0 accumulateive networking contacts, totalows representationrs referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable solely to ascertain extinguished counsel abextinguished others, still so to amalgamate with others through continuity to their profiles, combination and creating adjust, and power to grant general and individual messages to their friends restraint in Face tome, MySpace, and sharing with them their delighted moments as on Picasa and flutter. It has qualifyd the static counsel to past locomotive, dynamic and obedient sordidwealth, falsehood and sharing of fulls.

On the biases of Orielly specification Markus Angermeier constituted a desire map restraint edifice 2.0 which elucidate the guide concepts. These expressive concepts of Edifice 2.0 grasp Usability, Standardization, Cunning, Remixability, Economy, sordidwealth and mob.

Uspower is undivided of the guide factors of edifice 2.0. According to Lewis

“Edifice 2.0 contacts watch to face past affect desktop contacts than Edifice pages: they keep unworthyly interfaces with unreserved colours and no occupied patterns, logos, or buoyancy. They accumulate a fertileness of Interaction previously fix solely in desktop contacts” (Lewis, 2006).

He aid transcribe abextinguished the dynamic full of edifice 2.0 and counsel muster and assembling of counsel on a solitary page.

The origin of counsel is blogs which are affect online diaries, reorigin sharing which totaunworthy representationrs to ingredient-extinguished their favourite edifice concatenates and other reorigin affect tags (Lewis, 2006). In certainitys grasp del.icio.us and bibsonomy.org. Edifice 2.0 fulfils the standardization insist-uponments of (W3C) restraint contacts product and full lifetime. Cunning accumulate fertile face and feel with aptitudeed representationr-interface, glance epidemic manner and relief of representation. Remixpower is the address that Edifice 2.0 offers where an contact can be remixed with contrariant unwandering of other junior contacts concertedly to shape a strange and past interlocomotive contact.

The importation of Edifice 2.0 technologies such as AJAX breaks this unwandering pperiod settleed standard in incongruous restraintms. Transmitted edifice positions exist on a pperiod update standard where each interaction results in an perfect pperiod reconstitute Edifice 2.0 contacts totaunworthy deal-extinguished pperiod updates (Pilgrim, 2008). Restraint in, Google Maps do referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable insist-upon an perfect pperiod to be recreateed when the representationr selects a preferred conception. Google certainity gets the premise that lies extinguishedside of the policy of the map in constitute with extinguished recreateing perfect pperiod and totaunworthy representationr to grapple-with the map and draw it withextinguished any discontinuance (Zucker, 2007). Gmail so representations AJAX technology in aaffect shape to update the shabby ingredient of pperiod when strange email arrives (Pilgrim, 2008).

1.2 WEB 1.0 VS WEB 2.0

According to Musser and O’Reilly (2006)

“Edifice 2.0 is a unwandering of economic, accumulateive, and technology trends that synthetically shape the premise restraint the proximate lifetidings of the Internet—a past confirmed, extended medium characterised by representationr sordidwealth, ingenuousness, and netachievement effects”.

The deep discord among Edifice 1.0 and Edifice 2.0 is falsehood and bestowal of full. In Edifice 1.0 the superiority of representationrs acting as consumers of full, suitableness in Edifice 2.0 representationr can locomotively deal-outicipate in full falsehood and sharing and there are sundry technologies advantageous to constitute the full to its completion potential. The unconditional creation of Edifice 2.0 totaunworthy representationrs to constitute vary and ingredient-extinguished fulls of any peel (text, audio, video) and tag, criticise, and concatenate “Pages ” among adjust or extinguishedside the adjust. A remotepart-among progress in Edifice 2.0 is “mashups,” which concatenate or gain full in untried shapes (Cormode & Krishnamurthy, 2008). Restraint in, street addresses are concatenateed with a map Edifice position to visualize the locations. This statue of position concatenateperiod accumulates address to constitute borrowed concatenate among chronicles of any premisevile with other premisebase.

In edifice 1.0 herd implicitly put concatenates of sensational contrivances to their single residence pages. HTML shape tags divorce-among across perfect edifice with no address of tag vile browsing, exploration engines were using this passage as origin of edifice pperiod to correct the power of exploration, it limits the tagging in edifice 1.0 and which bind collaborative interaction and accumulateive intellect of fraternity (Brine & Page, 1998).

Suitableness edifice 2.0 entire undivided can deal-outicipate in tagging as it bebehove very referable-difficult job and bebehove the guide singularity of portals. “Ascribable to the abundant flake of the tagging fraternity, portals affect del.icio.us keep accumulated decent annotations in the shape of tags restraint bulky contrivances. These tags are representationd restraint exploration and navigation and Google AdSenseshape referable-difficult-to-learn summaries restraint the paintsquely contrivances” (Kinsella, et al., 2008)

Tim O’Reilly in his Article “What Is Edifice 2.0: Cunning Patterns and Business Standards restraint the Proximate Lifetidings of Software”, 2005 illustrate the discord of edifice1.0 and edifice2.0 as follows:

Web1.0

Web2.0

DoubleClick

Google AdSense

Ofoto

Flickr

Akamai

BitTorrent

mp3.com

Napster

Britannica Online

Wikipedia

single edificesites

blogging

Evite

upcoming.org and EVDB

dodeep call speculatio

exploration engine optimization

pperiod conceptions

consume per click

screen scraping

Edifice benefits

publishing

participation

full superintendence certainitys

wikis

directories (taxonomy)

tagging (“folksonomy”)

stickiness

syndication

(Table 1.0 What is Edifice 2.0: O’Reilly, 2005)

According to Gibson dynamic updates is undivided of the expressive singularity of edifice2.0 and this is adopted through AJAX technology (Gibson, 2007). Edifice2.0 edificesites accord representationr supplicate such as email checking or flash chatting. Edifice2.0 contacts so accumulate spontaneous updates such as accumulation quotes, sports scores and other counsel (Gibson, 2007). Mostly stranges positions affect BBC, Sky Stranges…etc. once updating providing flash counsel.

Web2.0 encourages the locomotive sordidwealth from the representationrs to bearing full and interaction with each other on the Edifice (Pilgrim, 2008). The full of Edifice 1.0 was ‘read-only’ and static. Whereas the alteration of edifice to qualifyd the learn-solely edifice to ‘read-write’ edifice strengthend representationr locomotive and collaborative sordidwealth.

The over graph parades that how permanent enlargement in internet usperiod according to the premise accumulated by Internet Cosmos-herd Stats with in a decade its usperiod agitate from 361 darling to 1650 darling representationrs cosmos-herd remote.

At the bestow stages full of edifice were static in their creation and they are referable attributable attributableify restraint lection view there were no interaction among representationrs and representationr produced full are at ignorable flake. As the compute of representationrs elevate it qualify the restraintm of full bestowal and generalation on internet and representationrs set-on-foot locomotive sordidwealth and involvement in the full and accumulateive intellect increased through this accumulateive learn/transcribe edifice. The qualify brought by Edifice 2.0 in full referable attributable attributableifying and decay evidently parades the dissipation among static edifice (web1.0) and dynamic edifice (web2.0). Edifice 2.0 accumulates pages with dynamic full which referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable solely can be learn by browsers or learners still with the cappower of despatches, collaborating and sharing knowlpolicy at the identical tidings.

1.3 WEB 2.0 ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES

There are a compute of Edifice 2.0 benefits and contacts advantageous which accumulate the fixation of Learn/Transcribe edifice. These hirelings totaunworthy representationrs to constitute, edit and disagree the full of counsel with collaboration. Edifice 2.0-established communities fill substantial spaces that are public, self-organizing, adaptive, lithe, learnily bearingible, and referable-difficult to rebestowal (Sabina & Leone, 2009). A Edifice 2.0 platshape has ingredient-outd cunning of benefits to help a collaborative and as sorted environment in which representationrs can amalgamate, ingredient-out, criticise and constitute strange full or software hirelings (Sabina & Leone, 2009).

Services offered among the Edifice 2.0 constituteachievement offers separationary benefits of the Internet fact. To be locomotive on internet firms keep no precious still to ascertain extinguished an withhold role using edifice2.0. Most elder firms, including BMW, IBM, Google, and abundant others, are positioning them-selves to ascertain their strategic situate, withhold situate and behove among these products (Wigand, Benjamin & Birkland, 2008).

In today’s edifice we ascertain contrariant statue of full. According to Paul Anderson (2007)

“These grasp blogs, wikis, multiresources sharing benefits, full syndication, podcasting and full tagging benefits. Abundant of these contacts of Edifice technology are proportionately confirmed, having been in rebestowal restraint a compute of years, although strange features and capabilities are nature borrowed on a certain premise It is estimate referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributableing that abundant of these strangeer technologies are concatenations, i.e. they gain rebestowal of solid benefits”.

In this individuality I conciliate discusses abextinguished some of the expressive activities Edifice 2.0 activities, these are Blogging, Folksonomy and Accumulateive Tomemarking, Multiresources Sharing, Accumulateive Networking, Podcasting.

1.3.1 BLOGGING

The tidings edifice-log, or blog, was coined by Jorn Barger in 1997 and refers to a unworthyly edificepperiod consisting of brief paragraphs of judgment, counsel, single diary entries, or concatenates, denominated shafts, stereotyped chronologically with the most novel eminentest, in the diction of an online record (Doctorow et al., 2002).

Blogs are so denominated online diaries which strengthen representationrs, withextinguished insist-uponment of any technical aptitude, to constitute, referable attributable attributableify and frame their possess edifice pages that apprehend dated full, entries, criticises, argument ceeseeing. in sequential adjust (Alexander, 2006; Castenade, 2007).

Herd can referable attributable attributableify counsel which they accumulate from sundry contrivances and settle bearing among them in blogs. Borrowedly RSS and the possibility to shaft criticises gain blogs so a collaborative and accumulateive-interlocomotive software contact (Petter et al., 2005).

San Murugesan bounds blogs a span- restraintm edifice-vile message hireling. Simply it is a edificeposition which is representationd to ingredient-extinguished thoughts and notions to license suggestions and criticises. An memorandum in blog command apprehend passage, statue, or concatenate to other blogs and edifice pages, and haply the other resources connected to the theme. Blogs keep power to produce record learnable RSS and Atom feeds it instrument they could be rebestowal to divorce-among record learnable summaries of fulls and accumulate the address of explorationing aaffect counsel from contrariant origins (Cayzer, 2004), (Anderson, 2007).

Bulky compute of internet representationrs complicated in blogging and they are operating in their possess environment. As technology has bebehove past hard, bloggers keep begun to thicken multiresources into their blogs and there are now photo-blogs, video blogs (vlogs), and, increasingly, bloggers can upload representative instantly from their ductile phones (Anderson, 2007).There are contrariant statues and categories of blogs. Such as Arts, Business, Computers and Technology, Counsel, Entertainment, Food, Fact, Law, Libraries, Music, Single, Political, Regional, Sports and finally Edifice.

Blogging software totalows three levels of seclusion password-protected most individual blog; representationr’s blog benebehove listed blog most general blog and conciliate be easily fix by exploration engines. An unlisted blog neither largely individual nor largely general. Unlisted blog canreferable attributable attributable be fix withextinguished intelligent the URL. It could be general solely if it apprehend a concatenate and someundivided however click that concatenate this restraintm these blogs chosen by exploration engines. Since most blogs apprehend concatenates that anyundivided command click on, unlisted blogs are referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable arrest, although they may redeep proportionately ultimate if they concatenate to positions that rare herd bearing and if the concatenates are referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable activated (Nardi et al., 2004).

Blogging is well-behaved-behaved knpossess spectre which representationd restraint online ventilate and arguments, ingredient-outd editing, single message and networking. In tidingss of adjusts, it totalows sundry authors or transcribers to unite with others to bestow their conceptions, judgments and to transcribe restraint teams, adjusts and adjust achievement.

1.3.2 FOLKSONOMY/TAGGING AND SOCIAL BOOKMARKING

A tag is a guideword that is borrowed to a digital sight (e.g. a edificesite, paint or video prune) to illustrate it, still referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable as deal-extinguished of a shapeal kind certainity. Undivided of the eminentest abundant-flake contacts of tagging was seen with the importation of Joshua Schacter’s del.icio.us edificesite, which inaugurated the ‘collective tomemarking’ inquisitiveness (Anderson, 2007). In edifice 2.0 Folksonomy as a accumulateive edifice benebehove accumulate address to representationrs to prevent and organise online their tomemarks with “collective annotations” or “tags”. These are eminent power descriptors of edifice pages’ themes and amiable-natured-natured indicators of edifice representationrs’ interests (Xu, et al., 2004).

Collective tome marking certainitys ingredient-extinguished compute of sordid features (Millen et al., 2005), they so accumulate the address of tagging these tomemarks and unaffect transmitted browser-vile tomemarks they can be appertain past that undivided sort. Tagging is remote past aid then edifice position tomemarking. Benefits affect Flutter (photos), YouTube (video) and Odeo (podcasts) totaunworthy a miscellany of digital artepremise to be synthetically tagged (Anderson, 2007). Representationrs add referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable solely in shafts and doctrines still so in from of tags which shape the metapremise of the full which accumulate precious counsel in full exploration. It so brings benefits of semantic edifice to ordinary edificesites which constitute collaborative tagging or Folksonomy. Del.icio.us is amiable-natured-natured in of remotely certain and collaboratively constituted tags, conwatch falsehood and blogging (Subramanya & Liu, 2008).

Collective tomemarking certainitys accumulate a acquitted motive restraint representationrs to deal-outicipate (Farrell et al., 2007). The notion of tagging has been extensive to grasp what are denominated tag clouds: adjusts of tags (tag unwanderings) from a compute of contrariant representationrs of a tagging benefit, which collates counsel abextinguished the abundance with which deal-outicular tags are representationd (Anderson, 2007).

1.3.3 MULTIMEDIA SHARING

According to Paul Anderson (2007) multiresources sharing is undivided of the biggest enlargement areas amongst benefits. Well-behaved-behaved knpossess ins are YouTube which accumulate video storperiod and sharing Flutter restraint photographs and Odeo restraint Podcasts. These benefits accumulate writable address which at the identical tidings gains representationrs as a consumers and arise locomotive sordidwealth and cemation of edifice fulls. There are darling of herd deal-outicipating in sharing and vary of these statues of resources by submissive their possess podcasts, videos and photos. This product was made practicable drastic remotepart-among preoption of eminent power and unworthy consume resources technology. Such as ductile devices which accumulate eminent power video capturing and photography address, camcorders with bulky storperiod ease.

Refrences

1 Usluel, Y.K. & Mazman, S.G. 2009, “Preoption of Edifice 2.0 hirelings in space counsel”, Procedia – Accumulateive and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 818-823.

2 Mason, R. & Rennie, F. 2007, “Using Edifice 2.0 restraint knowlpolicy in the fraternity”, The Internet and Eminenter Counsel, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 196-203.

3 Beldarrain, Y. 2006, Space Counsel Trends. Space Counsel 27(2), 139-153.

4 Murugesan, S. 2007, Understanding Edifice 2.0. IT Pro. Vol. July/August 2007. P. 34-41.

5 Usluel, Y.K. & Mazman, S.G. 2009, “Preoption of Edifice 2.0 hirelings in space counsel”, Procedia – Accumulateive and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 818-823.

6 O’Reilly, T. 2005, “Edifice 2.0: Compact Specification?” Referable attributable attributableifyed by O’Reilly Radar Author: Tim O Reilly: Advantageous online at: http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/10/web_20_compact_definition.html

7 Smith, A. 2009, Edifice 2.0 and Official Statistics: The UK Perspective: Advantageous online at: http://www.statssa.gov.za/isi2009/ScientificProgramme/IPMS/0146.pdf

8 Lewis, D. 2006, What is edifice 2.0?. Crossroads 13, 1 (Sep. 2006), 3-3. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1217666.1217669

9 Zucker, D. F. 2007, ‘What Does AJAX Mean restraint You?’, ACM Interactions, Sept-Oct, 2007, pp: 10-12.

10 Pilgrim, C. J. 2008, Improving the uspower of edifice 2.0 contacts. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Hyperpassage and Hyperresources (Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 19 – 21, 2008). HT ’08. ACM, Strange York, NY, 239-240. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1379092.1379144

11 Cormode, G. & Krishnamurthy, B. 2008, Guide Discords among Edifice1.0 and Edifice2.0: Advantageous online at: http://www2.research.att.com/~bala/papers/web1v2.pdf

12 Brin, S. & Page, L.1998, The dismemberment of a abundant-flake hypertextual edifice exploration engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst., 30(1-7):107-117.

13 Kinsella, S., Budura, A., Skobeltsyn, G., Michel, S., Breslin, J. G., and Aberer, K. 2008, From Edifice 1.0 to Edifice 2.0 and end -: how did your grandma rebestowal to tag?. In Proceeding of the 10th ACM Achievementshop on Edifice counsel and Premise Superintendence (Napa Valley, California, USA, October 30 – 30, 2008). WIDM ’08. ACM, Strange York, NY, 79-86. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458502.1458516

14 Gibson, B. 2007. Enabling an bearingible edifice 2.0. In Proceedings of the 2007 interdiplomatic Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Edifice Bearingibility (W4a) (Banff, Canada, May 07 – 08, 2007). W4A ’07, vol. 225. ACM, Strange York, NY, 1-6. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1243441.1243442

15 Adebanjo, D. & Michaelides, R. 2009. “Analysis of Edifice 2.0 strengthend e-clusters: A plight study”, Technovation, vol. In Press, Corrected Proof.

16 Sabin, M. and Leone, J. 2009. IT counsel 2.0. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Sig-counsel Technology Counsel (Fairfax, Virginia, USA, October 22 – 24, 2009). SIGITE ’09. ACM, Strange York, NY, 91-99. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1631728.1631756

17 Wigand, R. T., Benjamin, R. I., and Birkland, J. L. 2008. Edifice 2.0 and aid: implications restraint electronic merchandize. In Proceedings of the 10th interdiplomatic Conference on Electronic Merchandize (Innsbruck, Austria, August 19 – 22, 2008). ICEC ’08, vol. 342. ACM, Strange York, NY, 1-5. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1409540.1409550

18 CAYZER, S. 2004. Semantic Blogging and Decentralized knowlpolicy Superintendence. Messages of the ACM. Vol. 47, No. 12, Dec 2004, pp. 47-52. ACM Press.

19 Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., and Gumbrecht, M. 2004. Blogging as accumulateive spectre, or, would you permit 900 darling herd learn your diary?. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Helped Cooperative Achievement (Chicago, Illinois, USA, November 06 – 10, 2004). CSCW ’04. ACM, Strange York, NY, 222-231. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031607.1031643

20 Anderson

21 Murugesan

22 Xu, S., Bao, S., Fei, B., Su, Z., and Yu, Y. 2008. Exploring folksonomy restraint singleized exploration. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual interdiplomatic ACM SIGIR Conference on Reexploration and Product in counsel Retrieval (Singapore, Singapore, July 20 – 24, 2008). SIGIR ’08. ACM, Strange York, NY, 155-162. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1390334.1390363

23 Subramanya, S. B. and Liu, H. 2008. Accumulateivetagger – collaborative tagging restraint blogs in the desire retainer. In Proceeding of the 2008 ACM Achievementshop on Exploration in Accumulateive Resources (Napa Valley, California, USA, October 30 – 30, 2008). SSM ’08. ACM, Strange York, NY, 19-26. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458583.1458588

24 Remoterell, S., Lau, T., Nusser, S., Wilcox, E., and Muller, M. 2007. Synthetically augmenting employee profiles with herd-tagging. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on Representationr interface Software and Technology (Newport, Rhode Island, USA, October 07 – 10, 2007). UIST ’07. ACM, Strange York, NY, 91-100. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1294211.1294228

25 Siersdorfer, S. and Sizov, S. 2009. Accumulateive recommender certainitys restraint edifice 2.0 folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hyperpassage and Hyperresources (Torino, Italy, June 29 – July 01, 2009). HT ’09. ACM, Strange York, NY, 261-270. Advantageous online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1557914.1557959

26 MILLEN, D., FEINBERG, J., KERR, B. 2005. Accumulateive Tomemarking in the deed. ACM Queue, Nov 2005. Advantageous online at: http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=344 [decisive bearinged 2/02/10].

Apendix 1.0

DATE

NUMBER OF USERS

% WORLD POPULATION

INFORMATION SOURCE

December, 1995

16 darlings

0.40%

IDC

December, 1996

36 darlings

0.90%

IDC

December, 1997

70 darlings

1.70%

IDC

December, 1998

147 darlings

3.60%

C.I.Almanac

December, 1999

248 darlings

4.10%

Nua Ltd.

March, 2000

304 darlings

5.00%

Nua Ltd.

July, 2000

359 darlings

5.90%

Nua Ltd.

December, 2000

361 darlings

5.80%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2001

458 darlings

7.60%

Nua Ltd.

June, 2001

479 darlings

7.90%

Nua Ltd.

August, 2001

513 darlings

8.60%

Nua Ltd.

April, 2002

558 darlings

8.60%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

July, 2002

569 darlings

9.10%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

September, 2002

587 darlings

9.40%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2003

608 darlings

9.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

September, 2003

677 darlings

10.60%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

October, 2003

682 darlings

10.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

December, 2003

719 darlings

11.10%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

February, 2004

745 darlings

11.50%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

May, 2004

757 darlings

11.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

October, 2004

812 darlings

12.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

December, 2004

817 darlings

12.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2005

888 darlings

13.90%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

July, 2005

939 darlings

14.60%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

September, 2005

957 darlings

14.90%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

November, 2005

972 darlings

15.20%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

December, 2005

1,018 darlings

15.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2006

1,022 darlings

15.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

June, 2006

1,043 darlings

16.00%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

September, 2006

1,066 darlings

16.40%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

December, 2006

1,093 darlings

16.70%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2007

1,129 darlings

17.20%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

June, 2007

1,173 darlings

17.80%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

Sept, 2007

1,245 darlings

18.90%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

Dec, 2007

1,319 darlings

20.00%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2008

1,407 darlings

21.10%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

June, 2008

1,463 darlings

21.90%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

December, 2008

1,574 darlings

23.50%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

March, 2009

1,596 darlings

23.80%

Internet Cosmos-herd Stats

June, 2009

IN NEED OF CUSTOM WRITING HELP FOR THIS PAPER OR SIMILAR ASSIGNMENTS? PLACE ORDER NOW & GET INSTANT ASSISTANCE!

essay assignment writing

5 to 15% OFF Discount!!

For all your orders at Homeworkacetutors.com get discounted prices!
Top quality & 100% plagiarism-free content.