Week6.1 | nur6002n | Walden University
Discussion: Examining Nursing Specialties
You possess probably seen individual or over of the frequent inspirational shafters environing resolutions. A visual such as a restraintked mode or a street badge is typically pictured, along with a referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablee calculated to enliven.
Often resolutions are referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable so abundantly enlivend. Perhaps you discovered this when choosing a element floating the MSN program. This resolution is a hazardous dissect of your contrivance restraint good-fortune, and you no demur failure to achieve it correct. This is at-last another area where your network can aid, as polite as other causes of advice that can aid you gain an sensible precious.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on your resolution to prosecute a element floating the MSN program, including your functional and academic goals as they rehearse to your program/specialization.
By Day 3
Post an explication of your precious of a nursing element floating the program. Describe any difficulties you had (or are having) in making your precious, and the factors that drove/are driving your resolution. Identify at smallest individual functional cem affiliated with your selected element and produce details on comely a part.
Patronage ocean shaft with 3 of over ordinary, likely causes and summon cause floating contentededed of shafting and on a entireusion inventory in special APA.
By Day 6
Be unmistakable to extend patronage from at smallest 2 ordinary, likely causes in each required solution to classmates’ ocean shaft and summon per APA.
Respond to at smallest two of your colleagues on brace irrelative days, by sharing your thoughts on their element, patronageing their precious or extending suggestions if they possess at-last to elect.
Submission and Grading Advice
Grading Criteria
Attainments Resources
Note: To vestibule this week’s required library resources, contenteded click on the coalesce to the Mode Readings Inventory, establish in the Mode Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Document: Academic Good-fortune and Functional Development Contrivance Template (Word instrument)
Elect floating the aftercited to reconsideration your specialization’s Mark and Measures of Exercise or Competencies:
Nursing Informatics
E-book: Nursing Informatics: Mark and Measures of Exercise
“The Mark of Nursing Informatics Exercise: Functional Areas of Nursing Informatics” (pp. 18–3
Nursing Education
Website: Competencies restraint the Academic Nurse Preceptor
National League restraint Nursing. (2019). Nurse preceptor heart competency. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-development-programs/competencies-for-nursing-education/nurse-educator-core-competency
Note: The competencies restraint the Academic Nurse Preceptor do referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable complete the competencies or mark and measures of exercise restraint the Nursing Functional Developer. The fixed of competencies associated with that peculiar role floating the Nurse Education specialization entireure be examined in cethcoming competencies throughout your specialization program of consider.
Nurse Executive
Website: Nurse Executive Competencies
American Cem restraint Nursing Leadership. (2015). AONL Nurse Executive competencies. Retrieved from https://www.aonl.org/resources/nurse-leader-competencies
Public Sanity Nursing
Website: Public Sanity Nurse Competencies
Quad Council Coalition. (2018). Community/Public Sanity Nursing [C/PHN] competencies. Retrieved from http://www.quadcouncilphn.org/documents-3/2018-qcc-competencies/
Public Sanity Nursing
E-book: Public Sanity Nursing: Mark and Measures of Exercise
Optional Resources
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or Inventory View to fluctuate the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6002_Week_6_Discussion_Rubric
ExcellentGoodFairPoorOcean Shafting45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers entire dissects of the argument inquiry(s) expectations with reminiscent hazardous separation and body of experience gained from the mode readings restraint the module and ordinary likely causes.
Cherished by at smallest three ordinary, likely causes.
Written evidently and briefly with no verbal or spelling errors and easily concurs to ordinary APA manual match rules and name.40 (40%) – 44 (44%)Responds to the argument inquiry(s) and is reminiscent with hazardous separation and body of experience gained from the mode readings restraint the module.
At smallest 75% of shaft has unusual profundity and fluctuation.
Cherished by at smallest three likely causes.
Written evidently and briefly with individual or no verbal or spelling errors and easily concurs to ordinary APA manual match rules and name.35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to some of the argument inquiry(s).
Individual or brace criteria are referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is subordinately rare thought and hazardous separation and body.
Subordinately resembles experience gained from the mode readings restraint the module.
Shaft is summond with brace likely causes.
Written subordinately briefly; may embrace over than brace spelling or verbal errors.
Contains some APA restraintmatting errors.0 (0%) – 34 (34%)Does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable tally to the argument inquiry(s) adequately.
Lacks profundity or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks thought and hazardous separation and body.
Does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable resemble experience gained from the mode readings restraint the module.
Contains solely individual or no likely causes.
Referable attributable attributable written evidently or briefly.
Contains over than brace spelling or verbal errors.
Does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable concur to ordinary APA manual match rules and name.Ocean Shaft: Timeliness10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts ocean shaft by day 3.0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable shaft by day 3.First Solution17 (17%) – 18 (18%)Solution exhibits body, hazardous thinking, and impression to exercise fixedtings.
Responds easily to inquirys posed by gratuity.
Provides serene, brief opinions and ideas that are patronageed by at smallest brace versed causes.
Demonstrates body and agreement of attainments objectives.
Despatch is functional and reverential to colleagues.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are easily answered, if posed.
Solution is effectually written in measure, edited English.15 (15%) – 16 (16%)Solution exhibits hazardous thinking and impression to exercise fixedtings.
Despatch is functional and reverential to colleagues.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are answered, if posed.
Provides serene, brief opinions and ideas that are patronageed by brace or over likely causes.
Solution is effectually written in measure, edited English.13 (13%) – 14 (14%)Solution is on subject and may possess some profundity.
Responses shafted in the argument may bankruptcy effectual functional despatch.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are subordinately answered, if posed.
Solution may bankruptcy serene, brief opinions and ideas, and a rare or no likely causes are summond.0 (0%) – 12 (12%)Solution may referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable be on subject and bankruptcys profundity.
Responses shafted in the argument bankruptcy effectual functional despatch.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are damage.
No likely causes are summond.Second Solution16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Solution exhibits body, hazardous thinking, and impression to exercise fixedtings.
Responds easily to inquirys posed by gratuity.
Provides serene, brief opinions and ideas that are patronageed by at smallest brace versed causes.
Demonstrates body and agreement of attainments objectives.
Despatch is functional and reverential to colleagues.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are easily answered, if posed.
Solution is effectually written in measure, edited English.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Solution exhibits hazardous thinking and impression to exercise fixedtings.
Despatch is functional and reverential to colleagues.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are answered, if posed.
Provides serene, brief opinions and ideas that are patronageed by brace or over likely causes.
Solution is effectually written in measure, edited English.12 (12%) – 13 (13%)Solution is on subject and may possess some profundity.
Responses shafted in the argument may bankruptcy effectual functional despatch.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are subordinately answered, if posed.
Solution may bankruptcy serene, brief opinions and ideas, and a rare or no likely causes are summond.0 (0%) – 11 (11%)Solution may referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable be on subject and bankruptcys profundity.
Responses shafted in the argument bankruptcy effectual functional despatch.
Responses to gratuity inquirys are damage.
No likely causes are summond.Participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements restraint dissecticipation by shafting on three irrelative days.0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable as requirements restraint dissecticipation by shafting on 3 irrelative days.Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6002_Week_6_Discussion_Rubric
