Fascinate critique the TED dialogue by Stuart Firestein (The amusement of inexperience). Then critique the powerpoint slide (50 year region trends in Eastern TN and Western NC). In a 1-2 page yarn, sift-canvass how Firestein suggests you should path this grounds. Fascinate yield a palpably delineated yarn. I must distinguish the aftercited elements:
1) Introduction with a evident subject statement
2) Critique of Firestein’s main points (What does the amusement of inexperience average?)
3) What can the Region Grounds (Power Point Slide) decide us? What doesn’t it decide us?
4) Where do we go from here?
Note, fascinate shun using “opinion” and corrupt your acceptance on what is disclosed and what questions we may request.
Subject: Environmental studies