Posted: July 30th, 2023

Understanding the Impact of Social Media on Emotional Well-Being

Review the Final Project Rubric, located in the Course Information area, and consider the requirements needed for the Final Project Assignment.
Select two psychological theories and consider how they relate to the topic you chose in Week 1 and Week 7.
Write a 5- to 6-page paper (apart from the title page and references) that references at least four scholarly articles and includes at least two unique articles for each theory you selected. Your final project should include the following:

A description of both theories you selected and why you think they are appropriate for the topic you chose from the list or that was pre-approved by your Instructor by the end of Week 5
A comparison of the theories related to the topic you chose
An argument as to which theory provides a better understanding of the topic
An explanation of how psychological research grounded in these two theories helped you better understand the characteristics of the topic
An examination of cultural aspects that might contribute to that understanding
See Final Project Overview in Week 10 Learning Resources for layout.Note: Support your statements with the scholarly sources you identified using both in-text citations and references. It is strongly recommended that you include proper APA format and citations.
Course: Themes and Theories of Psychology

Theories Selected:
Social Cognitive Theory
Self-Determination Theory
The Rationale for Selection:
Social Cognitive Theory
Social Cognitive Theory, created by Albert Bandura, offers a structure to comprehend the effect of social media on emotional well-being. This hypothesis spotlights the return relationship between people, their condition, and their conduct. It lifts the job of impressive learning, self-adequacy convictions, and individual office in forming human behavior (Beauchamp et al., 2019). Social Cognitive Theory can help explain the sources and advancement of how social media use affects emotional well-being outcomes. The theory expresses that people learn through observation and duplication of others’ activities, which also applies to social media use (Beauchamp et al., 2019). Taking a gander at others participating in harmful practices or experiencing negative results on social media can prompt the selection of comparative approaches or the improvement of adverse mental outcomes, for example, low confidence, melancholy, or uneasiness.
Self-Determination Theory
Self-Determination Theory (SDT), pioneered by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, focuses on self-driven motivation and the psychological necessities that influence human conduct. This hypothesis accentuates the significance of autonomy, skill, and connection in promoting personal growth and prosperity. In the social media setting, SDT can uncover how achieving these psychological needs affects people’s experiences and results.
Social media platforms often provide opportunities for self-expression and connection, which can satisfy individuals’ need for relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2022). However, excessive social media use or engagement in certain behaviors (e.g., seeking validation through likes or comments) may compromise individuals’ autonomy and lead to external regulation or dependence on social media for self-worth.
Both theories selected have strengths and limitations. Social Cognitive Theory provides valuable insights into the observational learning processes and the role of self-efficacy, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of how social media influences mental health outcomes. Self-Determination Theory focuses on intrinsic motivation and psychological needs, highlighting the importance of autonomy and relatedness (Ryan & Deci, 2022). It offers a framework for designing interventions that promote healthy social media use and foster positive well-being.

References
Beauchamp, M. R., Crawford, K. L., & Jackson, B. (2019). Social cognitive theory and physical activity: Mechanisms of behavior change, critique, and legacy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 110-117.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and well-being research (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Understanding the Impact of Social Media on Emotional Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis of Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Determination Theory

Introduction

This paper aims to explore the impact of social media on emotional well-being by employing two psychological theories, namely Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT). Social media has become an integral part of modern society, influencing individuals’ emotions, behaviors, and mental health. The selected theories offer unique perspectives in understanding the complex relationship between social media use and emotional well-being, shedding light on the mechanisms that drive behavior and motivation in the digital age.

Social Cognitive Theory (SCT)
Social Cognitive Theory, proposed by Albert Bandura, provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the reciprocal interactions between individuals, their environment, and their behaviors (Beauchamp et al., 2019). The theory emphasizes the role of observational learning and self-efficacy beliefs in shaping human behavior. In the context of social media, SCT can offer valuable insights into how the use of these platforms influences emotional well-being.

Observational Learning on Social Media:
According to SCT, individuals learn by observing and imitating others’ behaviors. On social media, people are constantly exposed to various posts, images, and videos depicting both positive and harmful actions. Observing others engaging in harmful practices or experiencing negative outcomes can lead to the adoption of similar behaviors or the development of adverse mental outcomes, such as low self-esteem, depression, or anxiety (Beauchamp et al., 2019).

Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs:
Self-efficacy beliefs refer to an individual’s perception of their ability to perform a particular behavior successfully. On social media, users may encounter challenging situations that can either boost or undermine their self-efficacy. For example, receiving positive feedback and support from peers can enhance one’s self-efficacy, encouraging further positive engagement. Conversely, facing criticism or cyberbullying may decrease self-efficacy and discourage individuals from participating actively.

Self-Determination Theory (SDT)
Self-Determination Theory, pioneered by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, focuses on the intrinsic motivation and psychological needs that drive human behavior (Ryan & Deci, 2022). The theory highlights three essential psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. In the context of social media, SDT can shed light on how these needs influence users’ experiences and emotional well-being.

Autonomy and Social Media Use:
Autonomy refers to individuals’ need for self-determination and control over their actions. Social media platforms offer users the opportunity for self-expression, which can fulfill their need for autonomy. However, excessive social media use or seeking validation through likes and comments can lead to a sense of dependence on social media for self-worth, compromising users’ autonomy.

Relatedness and Social Media Engagement:
Relatedness pertains to the need for social connection and belongingness. Social media platforms facilitate connections with friends, family, and like-minded individuals, satisfying the need for relatedness. Positive interactions on social media can foster a sense of community and well-being. However, excessive comparison with others and the prevalence of negative interactions can hinder relatedness, leading to feelings of isolation and loneliness.

Comparison of SCT and SDT in Understanding Emotional Well-Being on Social Media

While both SCT and SDT offer valuable insights into the impact of social media on emotional well-being, they emphasize different aspects of human behavior and motivation. SCT focuses on observational learning and self-efficacy beliefs, providing a comprehensive understanding of how individuals learn from social media content and how their perceptions of self-efficacy influence engagement. On the other hand, SDT emphasizes intrinsic motivation and psychological needs, shedding light on how the fulfillment of autonomy and relatedness on social media can affect emotional well-being.

Determining the More Appropriate Theory

Determining which theory provides a better understanding of emotional well-being on social media depends on the specific context and research question. If the focus is primarily on how individuals learn and adopt behaviors from social media content, SCT might be more appropriate. Conversely, if the emphasis is on understanding the role of intrinsic motivation and psychological needs in shaping emotional experiences on social media, SDT would be more relevant.

Psychological Research Contributions

Psychological research grounded in SCT and SDT has been instrumental in providing empirical evidence to support the theories’ premises. Studies applying SCT have demonstrated how observational learning and self-efficacy beliefs influence various health behaviors, including physical activity (Beauchamp et al., 2019). Similarly, research informed by SDT has explored how satisfaction of psychological needs on social media affects users’ well-being, contributing to the field of positive psychology (Ryan & Deci, 2022). Such research has deepened our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the relationship between social media use and emotional well-being.

Cultural Aspects

Cultural factors play a significant role in shaping individuals’ experiences with social media and their emotional well-being. Different cultures may place varying levels of emphasis on autonomy, relatedness, and observational learning, influencing users’ behaviors and emotional responses on social media platforms. Cross-cultural studies utilizing SCT and SDT can help uncover cultural nuances and inform culturally sensitive interventions to promote positive emotional well-being on social media.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Determination Theory offer valuable insights into understanding the impact of social media on emotional well-being. SCT highlights the role of observational learning and self-efficacy beliefs, while SDT emphasizes intrinsic motivation and psychological needs. Both theories contribute to our understanding of how social media influences emotional outcomes, and researchers should consider the specific context and research question to determine which theory is more appropriate for their investigations. Cultural factors also play a significant role in shaping individuals’ experiences on social media, necessitating culturally sensitive approaches to promote positive emotional well-being in the digital age.

References:

Beauchamp, M. R., Crawford, K. L., & Jackson, B. (2019). Social cognitive theory and physical activity: Mechanisms of behavior change, critique, and legacy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 110-117.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2022). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and well-being research (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

(Add two more APA format references from scholar.google.com from 2016-2023.)

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Pharmacological Treatment for Addiction: A Review of Alcohol Use Disorder and Opioid Use Disorder »Comprehensive Care Plan for a Postoperative Patient Following Emergency Right Colectomy