Posted: September 20th, 2023

Theories of Reading Development

Theories of Reading Development

Paper instructions:
Early childhood education professionals are in the unique position to ensure that young learners are equipped with essential literacy skills. Research has shown that learning to read is not natural or automatic, as is learning to speak. In fact, in the process of developing literacy skills, the child’s brain changes. Early childhood educators must be prepared to not only teach basic literacy skills, but also to identify when a young learner may be showing signs of difficulty in mastering those skills due to a disability or other health concerns, and be equipped to support students’ literacy development.

Create a 12-15 slide digital presentation for teachers-in-training describing how the brain learns to read based on the science of reading research.

Begin your presentation with a brief introduction explaining the following:

The stages of reading development
The stages of writing development
The connection between English language systems (e.g., phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics) and literacy
For each of the following theoretical models of reading development, explain the key components and how young learners move through the phases of each theoretical model as they develop proficient reading skills:

The Simple View of Reading
Scarborough’s Reading Rope
Four-Part Processor Model
Carol Tolman’s Hourglass
Ehri’s Phases
Include a title page, presenter’s notes, and reference page.

Presenter’s notes are required for each content slide. Presentation must include a title slide at the beginning, and a reference slide with documentation of resources at the end. The title slide and reference slide are not included in the total number of slides.

Support your presentation with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Theories of Reading Development
Introduction
Learning to read is a complex process that involves the integration of multiple language skills. Over decades of research, several theoretical models have been proposed to explain how children acquire literacy and the developmental progression of reading ability. This article will explore five prominent theories of reading development: the Simple View of Reading, Scarborough’s Reading Rope, the Four-Part Processor Model, Carol Tolman’s Hourglass Model, and Ehri’s Phases of Reading Development. Understanding these theoretical frameworks can help early childhood educators understand how reading skills emerge and identify potential areas of difficulty for struggling readers.
The Stages of Reading Development
Reading development occurs in distinct stages as children’s language and cognitive abilities mature (Chall, 1983). In the earliest stage, from ages 6-7, children are learning the basic connections between letters and sounds through phonics instruction. They can identify individual letter-sound correspondences but are not yet reading whole words or text independently.
From ages 7-8, children begin to consolidate phonics skills and can read simple text made up of familiar word patterns. Around age 8, as vocabulary and fluency increase, children transition to reading for learning – using reading to acquire new information and concepts across subject areas. In the final stage, usually beginning around age 9, children read to evaluate and critique what they read. They can make inferences and think critically about increasingly complex texts and ideas (Chall, 1983).
The Stages of Writing Development
Like reading, writing also develops sequentially as fine motor skills, spelling, and composition abilities mature (Gentry, 1982). In the earliest stage, from preschool to kindergarten, children engage in experimental writing by scribbling and using letter-like forms and symbols to convey meaning.
From kindergarten to first grade, writing becomes more conventionalized as children learn to represent sounds with letters. They can write their own name and simple words but not yet sentences. During the second grade, the transitional spelling stage, children start using phonetic spelling and can write simple sentences and stories.
In the third and fourth grade, the self-correcting stage, spelling becomes more accurate as children learn common spelling patterns. By fifth grade, children have largely mastered the conventions of spelling and are moving into the mature language stage of writing, where they can independently produce a variety of written genres and texts (Gentry, 1982).
The Connection Between Language and Literacy
Reading and writing abilities are built upon a foundation of oral language competence across five language domains: phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics (National Early Literacy Panel, 2008). Phonological awareness, the ability to identify and manipulate the sound structure of oral language, is a strong predictor of later reading success. Morphological awareness, understanding the smallest units of meaning like prefixes and suffixes, also contributes to vocabulary development and reading comprehension.
Syntax, the rules that govern sentence structure, must be mastered for comprehending the meaning and organization of written text. Semantics involves vocabulary knowledge and the ability to interpret word meanings. Pragmatics encompasses using language appropriately within social contexts. Deficits in any of these language domains can negatively impact literacy acquisition if not addressed with early intervention (National Early Literacy Panel, 2008).
The Simple View of Reading
The Simple View of Reading, proposed by Gough and Tunmer in 1986, provides a basic conceptual model for understanding the components of reading. It states that reading comprehension is the product of decoding ability multiplied by linguistic comprehension. In other words, to be a proficient reader one must be able to recognize words (decoding) and understand language (linguistic comprehension) (Gough & Tunmer, 1986).
Both decoding and linguistic comprehension are necessary – a weakness in either area will impede reading development. The Simple View emphasizes that reading is not a single, undifferentiated skill but requires the integration of multiple language processes. It highlights the importance of explicitly teaching phonics for decoding as well as oral language and vocabulary for comprehension (Gough & Tunmer, 1986).
Scarborough’s Reading Rope
Scarborough (2001) expanded on the Simple View with her “Reading Rope” model, which provides a more detailed look at the language components involved in early reading. Her rope is woven of several skill “strands” that develop reading ability when integrated. The lower level strands include word recognition skills like phonological awareness, decoding, and sight recognition.
The higher level strands involve language comprehension abilities such as vocabulary, grammar, verbal reasoning, and literacy knowledge. Scarborough’s model emphasizes that reading instruction should target both the lower level decoding strands as well as higher level language comprehension strands simultaneously from an early age. It recognizes reading as an interaction between bottom-up processing of print and top-down use of language and background knowledge (Scarborough, 2001).
The Four-Part Processor Model
The Four-Part Processor Model, proposed by Seidenberg and McClelland in 1989, views reading as involving parallel processing within four interactive components: the orthographic processor for visual word recognition, the phonological processor for sounding out words, the semantic system for word meanings, and the syntactic/contextual system for sentence-level comprehension.
In this model, reading is an self-teaching process where the processors work together to associate letters with sounds and meanings based on statistical regularities in the written language system. It emphasizes the importance of phonics instruction to help children learn letter-sound correspondences which then allows the processors to “tune” themselves for automatic word recognition over time (Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989).
Carol Tolman’s Hourglass Model
Tolman’s Hourglass Model, developed in 2005, portrays reading as a dynamic process that narrows initially from multiple language cues to individual letters and sounds, then expands again to incorporate context. In the early “fan” stage, children rely heavily on context, pictures, and memory-based word recognition to construct meaning from print.
As phonics instruction progresses, the “neck” of the hourglass represents the consolidation of letter-sound knowledge and decoding skills. In the later “fan” stage, automatic word recognition allows children to once again integrate multiple language cues simultaneously for fluent, comprehension-driven reading (Tolman, 2005). The hourglass shape emphasizes the shifting role of context and decoding across the continuum of reading development.
Ehri’s Phases of Reading Development
Ehri (1995, 2014) proposed a developmental phase theory of reading acquisition consisting of four progressive phases: pre-alphabetic, partial alphabetic, full alphabetic, and consolidated alphabetic. In the pre-alphabetic phase, children lack knowledge of the alphabetic system and rely on visual cues like logos.
The partial alphabetic phase begins as children learn some letter-sound connections but cannot yet read whole words. In the full alphabetic phase, readers can decode regularly spelled words by blending letters into sounds. Finally, the consolidated alphabetic phase involves rapid, automatic word recognition through knowledge of letter patterns in morphemes and roots (Ehri, 1995, 2014). Ehri’s theory emphasizes the gradual progression from non-alphabetic to fully alphabetic processing as children learn to “sight read” words.
Conclusion
In summary, the theories of reading development presented provide frameworks for understanding the complex cognitive and linguistic processes involved in learning to read. While each theory has slightly different emphases, they all recognize reading as an integration of decoding skills, language comprehension, print knowledge, and the ability to apply these interactively in text. Early childhood educators can draw from these models to design developmentally appropriate, comprehensive literacy instruction targeting all the essential strands of reading.
References
Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00077.x
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 192-200.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. research essay writing service Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
Tolman, C. (2005). The developmental perspective in literacy
_________________________

Theories of Reading Development: Unlocking the Path to Literacy

Introduction

Learning to read is a journey that every child embarks on, but it’s not a simple or automatic process like learning to speak. Instead, it’s a complex cognitive endeavor that involves distinct stages and intricate linguistic connections. As early childhood educators, understanding the theories of reading development is crucial to our mission of equipping young learners with essential literacy skills and providing support where needed. In this presentation, we’ll delve into the stages of reading and writing development, explore the connection between language and literacy, and dissect five prominent theories of reading development.

Stages of Reading Development

Reading development unfolds in discernible stages, mirroring the growth of a child’s language and cognitive abilities (Chall, 1983):

Early Phonics Learning (Ages 6-7): At this stage, children start connecting letters to sounds through phonics instruction.

Consolidation (Ages 7-8): Children consolidate their phonics skills and begin reading simple, pattern-based text.

Reading for Learning (Around Age 8): Vocabulary and fluency grow, enabling children to read for acquiring new knowledge across subjects.

Critical Reading (Beginning Around Age 9): In this stage, children read critically, making inferences and analyzing complex texts (Chall, 1983).

Stages of Writing Development

Writing development progresses sequentially, maturing alongside fine motor skills, spelling, and composition abilities (Gentry, 1982):

Experimental Writing (Preschool to Kindergarten): Children begin with scribbling and using letter-like forms and symbols to convey meaning.

Conventional Writing (Kindergarten to First Grade): Writing becomes more structured as children learn to represent sounds with letters, though they can’t yet form complete sentences.

Transitional Spelling (Second Grade): Children start using phonetic spelling and can construct simple sentences and stories.

Self-Correcting (Third and Fourth Grade): Spelling accuracy improves as children grasp common spelling patterns.

Mature Language (Fifth Grade and Beyond): By this stage, children have mastered spelling conventions and can independently produce various written genres (Gentry, 1982).

Connection Between Language and Literacy

The bridge between language and literacy is solidified through five key language domains: phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics (National Early Literacy Panel, 2008):

Phonological Awareness: The ability to identify and manipulate the sound structure of oral language significantly influences reading success.

Morphological Awareness: Understanding prefixes and suffixes contributes to vocabulary growth and comprehension.

Syntax: Mastery of sentence structure rules is crucial for understanding written text.

Semantics: It involves vocabulary knowledge and word meaning interpretation.

Pragmatics: This domain encompasses using language appropriately within social contexts.

Deficits in any of these domains can hinder literacy development if not addressed early (National Early Literacy Panel, 2008).

The Simple View of Reading

The Simple View of Reading, proposed by Gough and Tunmer (1986), postulates that reading comprehension results from the interaction of decoding ability and linguistic comprehension. Both decoding (word recognition) and linguistic comprehension (understanding language) are equally essential. Proficient reading requires teaching phonics for decoding and fostering oral language and vocabulary for comprehension (Gough & Tunmer, 1986).

Scarborough’s Reading Rope

Scarborough (2001) extended the Simple View with her “Reading Rope” model, which elaborates on the language components involved in early reading. This model intertwines various skill “strands” that contribute to reading ability. Lower-level strands encompass word recognition skills, while higher-level strands involve language comprehension abilities. It underscores the importance of simultaneously addressing both decoding and language comprehension from an early age (Scarborough, 2001).

The Four-Part Processor Model

Seidenberg and McClelland (1989) introduced the Four-Part Processor Model, viewing reading as a process with four interacting components: the orthographic processor (visual word recognition), phonological processor (sounding out words), semantic system (word meanings), and syntactic/contextual system (sentence-level comprehension). This model emphasizes phonics instruction to help children associate letters with sounds, enabling automatic word recognition (Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989).

Carol Tolman’s Hourglass Model

Tolman’s Hourglass Model (2005) envisions reading as a dynamic process that narrows from multiple language cues to individual letters and sounds, then expands to incorporate context. The early “fan” stage relies on context and memory-based recognition, while phonics instruction narrows the focus, leading to fluent, comprehension-driven reading in the later “fan” stage. This model highlights the evolving role of context and decoding during reading development (Tolman, 2005).

Ehri’s Phases of Reading Development

Ehri’s developmental phase theory (1995, 2014) outlines four progressive phases in reading acquisition: pre-alphabetic, partial alphabetic, full alphabetic, and consolidated alphabetic. These phases highlight the gradual progression from non-alphabetic to fully alphabetic processing, culminating in rapid, automatic word recognition (Ehri, 1995, 2014).

Conclusion

In closing, these theories of reading development serve as invaluable roadmaps to understanding the intricate processes that underpin reading acquisition. They underscore that reading is more than just decoding; it’s an integration of various skills, including language comprehension and print knowledge. As early childhood educators, applying these theories in our teaching practices can help ensure that every child embarks on a successful literacy journey.

References

Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2), 116–125.

Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21.

Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36(2), 192-200.

Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10.

National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.

Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.

Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568

_______________________
Ace Tutors Study Notes:
Theories of Reading Development

Reading is one of the most complex and essential skills that humans can acquire. It involves the recognition and comprehension of printed words, as well as the integration of prior knowledge, motivation, and metacognition. How do we learn to read, and what factors influence our reading development and difficulties? In this blog post, we will review some of the major theories of reading development that have been proposed by researchers in different fields.

The Traditional View

The traditional view of reading is based on the assumption that reading is a bottom-up process, in which readers decode the written symbols into their corresponding sounds and meanings. According to this view, reading is a hierarchical and sequential skill that requires mastering a set of subskills, such as letter recognition, phonological awareness, word recognition, and syntactic parsing. Readers are passive recipients of information from the text, and meaning resides in the printed page. This view has been criticized for being too simplistic and neglecting the role of higher-level cognitive processes, such as background knowledge, inference making, and strategy use.

The Cognitive View

The cognitive view of reading challenges the traditional view by emphasizing the role of top-down processes in reading comprehension. According to this view, reading is a psycholinguistic guessing game, in which readers use their prior knowledge and expectations to make predictions and hypotheses about the text. Readers actively construct meaning from the text by using various sources of information, such as context clues, semantic cues, syntactic cues, and pragmatic cues. Reading is not a linear process, but a dynamic and interactive one that involves constant feedback and revision. This view also introduces the concept of schema theory, which posits that readers have organized networks of knowledge in their memory that help them interpret and integrate new information from the text.

The Metacognitive View

The metacognitive view of reading goes beyond the cognitive view by highlighting the role of self-regulation and control in reading comprehension. According to this view, reading is not only a cognitive process, but also a metacognitive one, in which readers monitor and evaluate their own understanding and performance. Readers use various strategies to plan, execute, check, and repair their reading comprehension. They also adjust their reading goals, pace, and strategies according to the task demands and their own strengths and weaknesses. Reading is not only a skill, but also an art that requires awareness, reflection, and flexibility.

Conclusion

These three views of reading development are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary and overlapping. They reflect different aspects and levels of reading comprehension that interact with each other in complex ways. Reading development is influenced by multiple factors, such as genetic predisposition, environmental exposure, linguistic background, cognitive abilities, motivational factors, and instructional methods. To understand how we learn to read and how we can help struggling readers, we need to consider all these factors and adopt an integrative and holistic approach.

Works Cited

Cain, Kate et al., eds. Theories of Reading Development. John Benjamins Publishing Company,
2017.

McBride-Chang Catherine. “Early Literacy across Languages.” Theories of Reading Development,
edited by Kate Cain et al., John Benjamins Publishing Company,
2017 pp. 55-74.

Nunan David. “The Learner-Centred Curriculum: A Study in Second Language Teaching.”
Cambridge University Press,
1991.

Stafura Joseph Z., Perfetti Charles A. “Integrating Word Processing with Text Comprehension:
Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Examples.” Theories of Reading Development,
edited by Kate Cain et al., John Benjamins Publishing Company,
2017 pp. 9-32.

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Asthma and stepwise management »Numerical Operations Centers