Posted: March 3rd, 2023

Essay 1: The Type of Judge I Would Be in Juvenile Court

Essay 1
Imagine you are a judge in juvenile court. What type of justice would you be; would you be lenient? Extra harsh? Explain your rationale for the type of judge you would be. What sorts of crimes would you be harsher about? Would the punishment you assign vary by the juvenile’s age? What other elements would factor into your discretionary decision?
Requirements:
Your paper must be at least ____350_____ words. Please double space your paper and use standard 12 point font. Please follow APA format when referencing information from outside sources. Please include your word count at the end of your assignment.
Essay 2
You are a juvenile justice expert. Write a report on whether or not you think the justice system needs to reform how girls are treated, particularly once they are in a juvenile detention center. If you do think reform is needed, explain what efforts should be made to bring about changes. If you do not think reform is needed, support your reasoning. Include 3 theories in your discussion.
Requirements:
Your paper must be at least ____350_____ words. Please double space your paper and use standard 12 point font.Please follow APA format when referencing information from outside sources.Please include your word count at the end of your assignment.

Essay 1: The Type of Judge I Would Be in Juvenile Court

As a judge in juvenile court, my main goal would be to provide justice to the juvenile offenders while keeping in mind their age, level of maturity, and circumstances surrounding the crime. I would not be extra harsh or lenient but would rather aim for a balance between punishment and rehabilitation, depending on the severity of the offense.

In cases where the crime committed is of a serious nature, such as murder, rape, or assault, I would be harsher in my judgment. On the other hand, for less severe crimes such as petty theft or drug possession, I would opt for rehabilitation programs rather than punishment. In both cases, my decision would depend on the individual circumstances of the case, the age of the offender, and their criminal history.

The punishment assigned would vary by the juvenile’s age, as younger juveniles may not understand the gravity of their actions and would require more rehabilitation and education to prevent recidivism. Older juveniles, on the other hand, may have a better understanding of their actions and would require a more severe punishment to deter them from committing similar crimes in the future.

My discretionary decision would also take into consideration the offender’s family situation, background, and support system. If the offender comes from a dysfunctional family, lacks a support system, or has mental health issues, I would opt for more rehabilitation and counseling rather than punishment. I believe that the purpose of the juvenile justice system is to help these young offenders understand their actions, take responsibility, and learn from their mistakes.

In conclusion, as a judge in juvenile court, my decision would be based on the individual circumstances of the case and the offender’s age, level of maturity, and background. I would aim for a balance between punishment and rehabilitation, depending on the severity of the crime and the individual’s needs.

Essay 2: Reforms Needed in the Treatment of Girls in Juvenile Detention Centers

The treatment of girls in juvenile detention centers is a cause for concern and warrants reforms in the justice system. Studies show that girls are more likely to be detained for non-violent offenses and are at a higher risk of being physically and sexually abused than their male counterparts.

One theory that could explain the mistreatment of girls in juvenile detention centers is the chivalry hypothesis. This theory suggests that women and girls are treated more leniently by the justice system because of gender biases that view them as weaker and in need of protection. This hypothesis may explain why girls are more likely to be detained for non-violent offenses and receive inadequate care while in detention.

Another theory is the intersectionality theory, which suggests that the mistreatment of girls in juvenile detention centers is a result of their intersecting identities. Girls from marginalized communities, such as those who are poor, Black, or Latinx, are more likely to be detained and face harsher punishments than their counterparts from privileged backgrounds.

To address these issues, the justice system needs to implement reforms that focus on providing adequate care and rehabilitation for girls in juvenile detention centers. This could include training staff on gender sensitivity and trauma-informed care, implementing gender-specific programs, and increasing access to mental health services.

Efforts should also be made to reduce the number of girls in detention centers by focusing on prevention programs and diversion programs that address the root causes of delinquency. These programs could focus on providing education, mentoring, and counseling services to at-risk girls and their families.

In conclusion, the mistreatment of girls in juvenile detention centers is a cause for concern and requires reforms in the justice system. By implementing gender-sensitive and trauma-informed care, reducing the number of girls in detention, and addressing the root causes of delinquency, the justice system can provide a safer and more equitable environment for girls in the

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: Evidence suggests that patients do better when their expectations »Epidemiological Tools