HI6028 – Taxation Theory, Practice & Law
Individual Assignment
Holmes Institute
Trimester 1, 2026
Weighting: 20%
Need a custom essay writer? Superior paper help with writing a similar assignment: HI6028 taxation assignment capital gains personal exertion loan income?
Our qualified academic writers, 75% of whom hold Masters or PhD degrees, write fully original papers tailored to your rubric, citation style, and deadline. Rated 4.9/5 by thousands of students. Free Turnitin plagiarism report included.
Get Expert Help →Assessment Description
This individual assignment assesses your ability to apply Australian taxation law to practical scenarios involving capital gains tax, income from personal exertion, and loan arrangements. You must interpret relevant legislation and case law, identify taxation issues, and provide reasoned conclusions supported by authority.
Submission Requirements
- Individual submission only.
- Word limit: Not more than 2,000 words (±10% acceptable).
- Format: MS Word, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font, 2 cm margins all sides, section headings, page numbers.
- Submit electronically via Blackboard (SafeAssign) by the due date (Week 10, 11:59 pm).
- Use Harvard referencing style for in-text citations and reference list.
- Minimum 8 references, including the prescribed textbook and recent authoritative sources (legislation, cases, ATO rulings, journal articles).
- Plagiarism checked automatically; breaches handled per Academic Integrity Policy.
- Late submissions incur penalties unless an approved extension is granted.
Questions
Question 1 (10 marks)
Your client Helen sold the following assets during the 2025/26 income year. Advise on the Capital Gains Tax consequences for each transaction, showing all workings and referencing relevant legislation and case law.
Can someone write my paper professionally and confidentially?
Yes — My Homework Ace Tutors connects you with expert human writers in your subject area. Every paper is written from scratch (zero AI), checked for plagiarism, formatted to your specifications, and delivered before your deadline with 100% confidentially. Free revisions for 14 days.
🖉 Start My Order →- An antique impressionist painting purchased by Helen’s father in February 1985 for $4,500; sold on 1 December 2025 for $13,000.
- A historical sculpture purchased in December 1993 for $5,800; sold on 1 January 2026 for $6,500.
- An antique jewellery piece purchased in October 1987 for $14,500; sold on 20 March 2026 for $13,800.
- A picture purchased by Helen’s mother in March 1987 for $520; sold on 1 July 2025 for $5,200.
Question 2 (5 marks)
Barbara, an economist researcher, accepted an offer of $14,000 from Eco Books Ltd to write a book on economics principles. She wrote the book titled ‘Principles of Economics’ in her spare time and assigned the copyright to Eco Books Ltd for $14,500. The book was published and she received payment. She also sold the manuscript to the company library for $4,800 and several interview transcripts for $3,500.
Discuss whether each payment constitutes income from Barbara’s personal exertion. Support your answer with relevant statutory provisions and case law. Would your conclusion differ if Barbara had completed the book before signing the contract and only later decided to sell it? Explain.
Question 3 (5 marks)
Patrick lent his son David $55,000 to assist with a new business venture. They agreed David would repay $62,000 after five years. No formal agreement or security existed, and Patrick stated no interest was required. David repaid the full amount after two years via cheque, including an additional 5% on the borrowed sum.
Save 20% on your first order today
Use code SAVE20 at checkout. Our writers deliver AI-free, plagiarism-free papers ranging from short 1-page essays to full dissertations, and with deadlines from 4 hours to weeks due assignments. Money-back guarantee included.
🏢 Claim 20% Off →Discuss the effect of this arrangement on Patrick’s assessable income, referencing relevant statutory provisions and case law.
Assignment Structure
- Question 1: Capital Gains Tax consequences for each asset (subheadings recommended).
- Question 2: Analysis of Barbara’s income under the main scenario and alternative scenario.
- Question 3: Effect on Patrick’s assessable income.
- Reference List (Harvard style).
Marking Criteria
| Criteria | Weighting | Excellent (HD) | Very Good (D) | Good (C) | Satisfactory (P) | Unsatisfactory (F) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question 1 – CGT antique painting | 2.5% | Accurate CGT consequences, correct calculation, proper referencing | Very good knowledge, minor error | Good knowledge, needs elaboration | Sound knowledge, referencing incomplete | Failed to identify consequences |
| Question 1 – CGT historical sculpture | 2.5% | Accurate method, clear workings/comments | Very good, minor calculation error | Good, minor error | Wrong method, incorrect figures | Failed to identify |
| Question 1 – CGT antique jewellery | 2.5% | Correct gain/loss, clear comments | Very good, minor error | Correct but lacks comments | Sound knowledge, incomplete | Failed to identify |
| Question 1 – CGT picture | 2.5% | Excellent response, accurate referencing | Very good, accurate | Good, needs elaboration | Sound knowledge, referencing weak | Failed to identify |
| Question 2 – Barbara main scenario | 2.5% | Excellent response, accurate law/cases | Very good, minor error | Good, some gaps | Sound knowledge, incomplete | No discussion/referencing |
| Question 2 – Barbara alternative scenario | 2.5% | All scenarios accurately addressed | Very good discussion | Well organised but some illogical points | Some conclusions reached | No discussion/referencing |
| Question 3 – Patrick’s income | 5% | Accurate effect, strong referencing | Very good, minor error | Good demonstration | Sound knowledge | No discussion/referencing |
Helen’s sale of the antique impressionist painting acquired before 20 September 1985 qualifies as a pre-CGT asset, making the $8,500 gain exempt from capital gains tax. The historical sculpture sold for a modest gain triggers CGT, but the 50% discount applies due to holding period exceeding 12 months. The antique jewellery produced a small loss that can offset other gains. The picture inherited from her mother retains the original acquisition date, exempting the gain as pre-CGT. Proper classification of acquisition dates and holding periods is essential to avoid incorrect tax liabilities (Barkoczy, 2025, Foundations of Taxation Law 2025, available at https://global.oup.com/academic/product/foundations-of-taxation-law-2025-9780190338695).
References
- Barkoczy, S., 2025. Foundations of taxation law 2025. 17th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/foundations-of-taxation-law-2025-9780190338695.
- Deutsch, R., 2024. Australian tax handbook 2024. Sydney: Thomson Reuters. Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/australian-tax-handbook-2024/productdetail/131456.
- Krever, R., 2023. Australian taxation law cases 2023. Sydney: Thomson Reuters. Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/australian-taxation-law-cases-2023/productdetail/130045.
- Sadiq, K., 2026. Principles of taxation law 2026. Sydney: Thomson Reuters. Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/principles-of-taxation-law-2026/productdetail/132001.
- Woellner, R., 2025. Australian taxation law 2025. 35th ed. Sydney: Thomson Reuters. Available at: https://legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/australian-taxation-law-2025/productdetail/131457.
