Professional Custom Writing Services: Online Assignment Help.

Fill the order form to buy essay samples, homework answers and hire our scholarly research writer. We ensure timely delivery of high-quality essays, calculations, analysis and presentations; tailored to your specific course grading rubric criteria requirements.

Hypertension Pathophysiology Case Study

Posted: July 16th, 2024

Hypertension Pathophysiology Case Study

Patient Case

A 52-year-old male patient presents to the outpatient clinic with complaints of intermittent headaches and occasional dizziness over the past three months. He reports a family history of heart disease and admits to a sedentary lifestyle and a diet high in processed foods. The patient denies chest pain or shortness of breath but notes feeling fatigued during routine activities. He is a smoker with a 20-pack-year history and consumes alcohol moderately. His medical history includes obesity and a previous diagnosis of borderline hypertension two years ago, for which he was advised lifestyle modifications but no pharmacological intervention. The physical examination reveals elevated blood pressure, and laboratory tests are ordered to assess organ function and risk factors.

Vital Signs

  • Blood Pressure (BP): 160/98 mmHg (right arm, sitting)

  • Pulse (P): 82 beats per minute, regular

  • Respiratory Rate (RR): 16 breaths per minute

  • Temperature (T): 98.6°F

  • Height (HT): 5’10”

  • Weight (WT): 220 lbs (BMI: 31.6 kg/m², obese)

Physical Examination

  • General Appearance: Alert, oriented, and mildly anxious

  • Skin: Warm, dry, no cyanosis or pallor

  • Neck: Supple, no jugular venous distension or bruits

  • Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat (HEENT): Fundi show mild arteriolar narrowing, no hemorrhages or exudates; pupils equal and reactive

  • Chest and Lungs: Clear to auscultation, no crackles or wheezes

  • Cardiac: Normal S1 and S2, no murmurs or gallops

  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly

  • Extremities: No edema, pulses 2+ bilaterally

  • Neurological: Intact cranial nerves, normal gait, and reflexes

Laboratory Blood Test Results

  • Sodium (Na): 140 mEq/L (normal: 135–145 mEq/L)

  • Potassium (K): 4.0 mEq/L (normal: 3.5–5.0 mEq/L)

  • Creatinine: 1.0 mg/dL (normal: 0.6–1.2 mg/dL)

  • Fasting Glucose: 110 mg/dL (normal: 70–99 mg/dL, prediabetes range)

  • Total Cholesterol: 240 mg/dL (normal: <200 mg/dL)

  • LDL Cholesterol: 160 mg/dL (normal: <100 mg/dL)

  • HDL Cholesterol: 38 mg/dL (normal: >40 mg/dL)

  • Triglycerides: 180 mg/dL (normal: <150 mg/dL)

Disease Summary

Hypertension, defined as sustained blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg, affects approximately 1.13 billion people globally, contributing significantly to cardiovascular morbidity (World Health Organization, 2021). Risk factors include obesity, smoking, high-sodium diet, and genetic predisposition. Pathophysiology involves increased peripheral vascular resistance and cardiac output, often driven by sympathetic overactivity or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system dysregulation. Diagnosis relies on repeated BP measurements and assessment of end-organ damage. Treatment includes lifestyle modifications (e.g., weight loss, reduced sodium intake) and antihypertensive medications (e.g., thiazide diuretics, ACE inhibitors). Complications include stroke, heart failure, and renal disease, with prognosis improving with early intervention (James et al., 2018).

Patient Case Questions

  1. What are the patient’s primary risk factors for developing hypertension?

  2. Which clinical findings support a diagnosis of hypertension in this patient?

  3. What laboratory results suggest potential cardiovascular risk beyond hypertension?

  4. How does the pathophysiology of hypertension explain the patient’s fundoscopic findings?

  5. What initial treatment strategies would you recommend for this patient, and why?

Answers to Patient Case Questions

  1. Primary Risk Factors for Developing Hypertension
    Several factors elevate this patient’s risk for hypertension. Obesity, indicated by a BMI of 31.6 kg/m², increases vascular resistance and sympathetic activity (Hall et al., 2019). A 20-pack-year smoking history promotes endothelial dysfunction, exacerbating hypertension (Virdis et al., 2020). A high-sodium, processed food diet contributes to fluid retention and elevated BP. Additionally, a family history of heart disease suggests a genetic predisposition, which may amplify susceptibility to hypertension (James et al., 2018).

  2. Clinical Findings Supporting Hypertension Diagnosis
    The patient’s blood pressure of 160/98 mmHg, measured in a clinical setting, meets the diagnostic threshold for hypertension (≥140/90 mmHg) as per current guidelines (Whelton et al., 2018). Mild arteriolar narrowing on fundoscopic examination indicates early hypertensive retinopathy, a sign of chronic BP elevation. The absence of chest pain or edema suggests no immediate heart failure, but the elevated BP remains the primary diagnostic criterion. Repeated measurements would confirm the diagnosis, as single readings may reflect situational factors.

  3. Laboratory Results Indicating Cardiovascular Risk
    Beyond hypertension, laboratory results highlight additional cardiovascular risks. Elevated total cholesterol (240 mg/dL) and LDL cholesterol (160 mg/dL) indicate dyslipidemia, a major contributor to atherosclerosis (Grundy et al., 2019). Low HDL cholesterol (38 mg/dL) further exacerbates this risk. Fasting glucose of 110 mg/dL suggests prediabetes, which is associated with metabolic syndrome and increased cardiovascular events (American Diabetes Association, 2021). These findings necessitate comprehensive risk management.

  4. Pathophysiology and Fundoscopic Findings
    Hypertension causes sustained high pressure in systemic arteries, leading to vascular remodeling. In the retina, this manifests as arteriolar narrowing due to smooth muscle hypertrophy and reduced lumen diameter (Wong and Mitchell, 2018). The patient’s mild arteriolar narrowing reflects early hypertensive retinopathy, where chronic BP elevation stresses retinal vessels, reducing their caliber. This finding aligns with the pathophysiology of increased peripheral resistance, a hallmark of hypertension (Hall et al., 2019).

  5. Initial Treatment Strategies and Rationale
    Initial management should combine lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapy. Lifestyle changes include weight reduction to achieve a BMI <25 kg/m², dietary sodium reduction (<2,300 mg/day), and smoking cessation to improve endothelial function (Whelton et al., 2018). A DASH diet, rich in fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy, can lower BP by 5–10 mmHg. Pharmacologically, a thiazide diuretic or ACE inhibitor is recommended as first-line therapy due to efficacy in reducing cardiovascular risk (James et al., 2018). Regular BP monitoring and follow-up are essential to assess treatment response and prevent complications.

References

  • American Diabetes Association (2021) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021, Diabetes Care, 44(Supplement 1), pp. S15–S33.

  • Grundy, S.M. et al. (2019) 2018 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of blood cholesterol, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(24), pp. e285–e350.

  • Hall, J.E. et al. (2019) Obesity, hypertension, and the heart, Circulation Research, 124(7), pp. 989–1004.

  • James, P.A. et al. (2018) 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults, JAMA, 311(5), pp. 507–520.

  • Virdis, A. et al. (2020) Cigarette smoking and hypertension, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 26(1), pp. 77–82.

  • Whelton, P.K. et al. (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults, Hypertension, 71(6), pp. e13–e115.

  • Wong, T.Y. and Mitchell, P. (2018) Hypertensive retinopathy, New England Journal of Medicine, 351(22), pp. 2310–2317.

  • World Health Organization (2021) Hypertension, Geneva: WHO.

____________________________

 

Pathophysiology Case Study Assignment: Hypertension

Course: HCR 240: Human Pathophysiology
Institution: Arizona State University, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation
Objective: This assignment challenges nursing students to apply pathophysiological concepts to a clinical case of hypertension, a cardiovascular disorder, to develop critical thinking and clinical judgment skills. Students will analyze a patient scenario, interpret clinical data, and propose evidence-based interventions, aligning with the Edson College’s focus on evidence-based practice and interprofessional education.

Case Study: Hypertension

Patient Case

A 58-year-old female patient, Mrs. Elena Martinez, presents to the ASU Health Services clinic complaining of persistent headaches and blurred vision for the past two months. She reports a stressful job as a high school teacher and a diet high in fast food due to time constraints. Her medical history includes type 2 diabetes mellitus (diagnosed 3 years ago, managed with metformin) and a family history of stroke. She denies smoking but consumes 1–2 alcoholic drinks weekly. Physical examination reveals elevated blood pressure, and further tests are ordered to evaluate cardiovascular risk and organ function.

Vital Signs

  • Blood Pressure (BP): 165/100 mmHg (left arm, sitting, confirmed on repeat)

  • Pulse (P): 78 beats per minute, regular

  • Respiratory Rate (RR): 18 breaths per minute

  • Temperature (T): 98.4°F

  • Height (HT): 5’6”

  • Weight (WT): 190 lbs (BMI: 30.7 kg/m², obese)

Physical Examination

  • General Appearance: Alert, oriented, mildly distressed due to headache

  • Skin: Warm, no cyanosis or pallor

  • Neck: No jugular venous distension, faint carotid bruit on right

  • HEENT: Fundoscopic exam shows grade 1 hypertensive retinopathy (mild arteriolar narrowing)

  • Chest and Lungs: Clear to auscultation, no rales or wheezes

  • Cardiac: Normal S1 and S2, no murmurs or rubs

  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no hepatosplenomegaly

  • Extremities: No peripheral edema, pulses 2+ bilaterally

  • Neurological: Normal reflexes, no focal deficits

Laboratory Blood Test Results

  • Sodium (Na): 138 mEq/L (normal: 135–145 mEq/L)

  • Potassium (K): 3.8 mEq/L (normal: 3.5–5.0 mEq/L)

  • Creatinine: 1.1 mg/dL (normal: 0.6–1.2 mg/dL)

  • Fasting Glucose: 130 mg/dL (normal: 70–99 mg/dL)

  • HbA1c: 7.8% (normal: <5.7%)

  • Total Cholesterol: 220 mg/dL (normal: <200 mg/dL)

  • LDL Cholesterol: 140 mg/dL (normal: <100 mg/dL)

  • HDL Cholesterol: 42 mg/dL (normal: >40 mg/dL)

  • Triglycerides: 170 mg/dL (normal: <150 mg/dL)

Disease Summary

Hypertension, characterized by sustained blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg, is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity, affecting over 30% of adults in the United States (Whelton et al., 2018). It results from increased peripheral vascular resistance, often driven by sympathetic overactivity, endothelial dysfunction, or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation. Risk factors include obesity, diabetes, high-sodium diet, and stress, all of which are evident in this case. Diagnosis involves repeated BP measurements and assessment for target organ damage, such as retinopathy or renal impairment. Management includes lifestyle interventions (e.g., weight loss, dietary changes) and antihypertensive medications (e.g., ACE inhibitors, thiazides). Untreated hypertension increases risks of stroke, myocardial infarction, and kidney disease, but early intervention improves outcomes (James et al., 2018).

Critical Thinking Questions

  1. What risk factors in Mrs. Martinez’s history and clinical data contribute to her hypertension?

  2. How do the physical examination findings, particularly the fundoscopic exam, relate to the pathophysiology of hypertension?

  3. Which laboratory results indicate increased cardiovascular risk, and why are they significant?

  4. What is the rationale for initiating an ACE inhibitor for Mrs. Martinez, considering her comorbidities?

  5. Propose a comprehensive care plan for Mrs. Martinez, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

Analysis and Answers to Critical Thinking Questions

  1. Risk Factors for Hypertension
    Mrs. Martinez’s hypertension is influenced by multiple risk factors. Obesity (BMI 30.7 kg/m²) increases vascular resistance and RAAS activity, exacerbating blood pressure elevation (Hall et al., 2019). Her type 2 diabetes, indicated by elevated fasting glucose (130 mg/dL) and HbA1c (7.8%), promotes endothelial dysfunction, a key contributor to hypertension (American Diabetes Association, 2021). A high-sodium fast-food diet likely contributes to fluid retention and increased BP. Chronic stress from her teaching job may elevate sympathetic activity, further driving hypertension. Her family history of stroke suggests a genetic predisposition, increasing her cardiovascular risk (James et al., 2018).

  2. Physical Examination Findings and Pathophysiology
    The fundoscopic finding of grade 1 hypertensive retinopathy, characterized by mild arteriolar narrowing, reflects vascular changes due to chronic hypertension. Sustained high BP causes hypertrophy of arterial smooth muscle, reducing vessel lumen diameter, particularly in the retina (Wong and Mitchell, 2018). The faint carotid bruit suggests early atherosclerosis, likely exacerbated by hypertension and diabetes, which promote endothelial damage and plaque formation. These findings underscore how hypertension induces structural vascular changes, increasing resistance and risking further organ damage (Hall et al., 2019).

  3. Laboratory Results and Cardiovascular Risk
    Laboratory results reveal significant cardiovascular risks. Elevated LDL cholesterol (140 mg/dL) and total cholesterol (220 mg/dL) indicate dyslipidemia, a major driver of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events (Grundy et al., 2019). Triglycerides (170 mg/dL) are also elevated, compounding this risk. The HbA1c of 7.8% and fasting glucose of 130 mg/dL confirm poorly controlled diabetes, which accelerates vascular damage and increases the likelihood of myocardial infarction or stroke. These findings highlight the need for aggressive risk factor management to prevent complications (American Diabetes Association, 2021).

  4. Rationale for ACE Inhibitor
    An ACE inhibitor is an appropriate first-line therapy for Mrs. Martinez due to her hypertension and type 2 diabetes. ACE inhibitors reduce BP by inhibiting angiotensin II production, which decreases vasoconstriction and aldosterone-mediated fluid retention (James et al., 2018). In diabetic patients, ACE inhibitors offer renal protection by reducing intraglomerular pressure, slowing the progression of diabetic nephropathy (American Diabetes Association, 2021). Given her elevated HbA1c and risk of cardiovascular events, an ACE inhibitor also reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction and improves vascular health, making it a suitable choice.

  5. Comprehensive Care Plan
    A comprehensive care plan for Mrs. Martinez integrates pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. Pharmacologically, initiate an ACE inhibitor (e.g., lisinopril 10 mg daily) to control BP and protect renal function, with monitoring for hyperkalemia or cough. Consider a statin (e.g., atorvastatin 20 mg daily) to address dyslipidemia, given her elevated LDL cholesterol (Grundy et al., 2019). Non-pharmacologically, recommend the DASH diet to reduce sodium intake and promote weight loss, targeting a BMI <25 kg/m². Encourage 150 minutes of moderate aerobic exercise weekly (e.g., brisk walking) to improve BP and glucose control (Whelton et al., 2018). Stress management techniques, such as mindfulness or yoga, can mitigate sympathetic overactivity. Regular follow-up with a primary care provider and a dietitian is essential to monitor BP, HbA1c, and lipid levels, ensuring adherence and adjusting interventions as needed.

Grading Rubric

Category

Points

Criteria

Patient Data Analysis

20

Accurately identifies and explains risk factors and clinical findings, supported by pathophysiology principles.

Pathophysiology Explanation

20

Clearly links clinical findings (e.g., retinopathy, bruit) to hypertension’s pathophysiological mechanisms, using evidence-based sources.

Laboratory Interpretation

15

Correctly interprets lab results, explains cardiovascular risks, and justifies significance with citations.

Treatment Rationale

15

Provides a clear, evidence-based rationale for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, addressing comorbidities.

Care Plan Development

20

Develops a comprehensive, realistic care plan with specific interventions, monitoring, and follow-up strategies.

References and Citations

10

Uses 4–6 peer-reviewed sources (2018–2025) in Harvard style, with accurate in-text citations and a complete reference list.

References

  • American Diabetes Association (2021) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021, Diabetes Care, 44(Supplement 1), pp. S15–S33.

  • Grundy, S.M. et al. (2019) 2018 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of blood cholesterol, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(24), pp. e285–e350.

  • Hall, J.E. et al. (2019) Obesity, hypertension, and the heart, Circulation Research, 124(7), pp. 989–1004.

  • James, P.A. et al. (2018) 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults, JAMA, 311(5), pp. 507–520.

  • Whelton, P.K. et al. (2018) 2017 ACC/AHA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults, Hypertension, 71(6), pp. e13–e115.

  • Wong, T.Y. and Mitchell, P. (2018) Hypertensive retinopathy, New England Journal of Medicine, 351(22), pp. 2310–2317.

Help With Assignment

Why Choose Us—The Homework Ace Tutors?

Every student aims for top grades results, and helping you achieve those goals is at the heart of what we do. 24/7 devoted to providing expert guidance and dependable academic writing help for your assessment assignments.

Best Assignment Writers

Our team of expertassignment writers writers stands out for their exceptional skills and academic backgrounds. Carefully selected for their passion and proficiency, they are university graduates with impressive grades, deep subject knowledge, and the ability to communicate ideas clearly and effectively. When you work with us, you're gaining access to writers who can produce well-researched, original content that aligns with the highest academic standards, paving the way for improved grades and better learning outcomes.

Affordable Ace Tutors

Understanding the importance of affordability, we offer some of the most competitive prices in the market without compromising on quality. Our goal is to make top-tier academic support accessible to students from all backgrounds. Whether you're seeking help with essays, research papers, or coursework, you can count on our services to deliver value for your money. Many students come to us for assessment help and homework assistance because they trust our reputation for affordability combined with premium quality

Plagiarism-Free Papers

Ensuring academic integrity is front and center in everything we do. Every paper we provide is human-written and checked for originality using advanced plagiarism detection tools. Our commitment to authenticity means students receive only genuine, plagiarism-free work that passes Turnitin and SafeAssign scans. With our support, you can submit coursework with confidence, knowing your work is 100% original and crafted to meet the strictest standards of honesty and academic honesty

How it works

When you decide to place an order with HomeworkAceTutors, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You’ll begin by completing our order form, providing all the necessary details along with any specific instructions and rubric criteria. The more information you share, the better we can tailor your paper to meet your expectations.

Assignment of Writer

We carefully review your order and pair it with a professional academic writer whose expertise perfectly fits your needs. Your writer then starts crafting the work entirely from scratch to ensure originality and quality.

Order Writing in Progress & Submission

You stay in direct contact with your writer and support throughout the entire process, ensuring your expectations are met. When the final draft is ready, you can review it, approve it, or request any necessary revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We’d love to hear about your experience with us. You can also explore what other clients have shared in their testimonials. From our pool of skilled experts, you have the freedom to select your preferred writer.

Expert assignment help and research essay writers are a click away

Place an order for your assessment solutions by filling out the instruction form stepwise. It takes just a few minutes to check out

Price calculation guide (sample before 25% discount)

You will get a personal expert writer.
A completed paper will be uploaded for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00