Assessment Task 3: Extended Clinical Reasoning Case Study – Medical-Surgical Nursing
Unit Code: NRSG378 Unit Title: Principles of Nursing: Extended Clinical Reasoning Assessment Type: Individual Written Case Study Word Limit: 2,000 words (±10%) Weighting: 50% Due Date: Wednesday, 4 June 2025, 2:00 pm AEST via Turnitin on LEO Learning Outcomes Assessed: LO1: Critically analyse complex clinical scenarios using extended reasoning frameworks; LO2: Integrate pathophysiological, pharmacological, and psychosocial data into care planning; LO3: Prioritise ethical and evidence-based interventions for acutely unwell patients; LO4: Evaluate care outcomes and reflect on professional development; LO5: Demonstrate person-centred communication in multidisciplinary contexts.
Task Overview
Apply the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2018) to an acute medical-surgical case involving decompensated heart failure. Demonstrate extended reasoning by linking assessment data to pathophysiology, prioritising three nursing issues, and justifying interventions with ethical, legal, and evidence-based rationale. This task builds on prior units, focusing on the holistic impact of acute illness. Select if aligned with your placement; consult LIC if unallocated by Week 5. Avoid repeating prior cases.
Case Scenario: Mr. Reginald Harris – Acute Exacerbation of Congestive Heart Failure
Mr. Reginald Harris, 72-year-old widower, admitted to the medical ward via ED with acute decompensated heart failure (CHF). Presented with 48-hour history of increasing dyspnoea on minimal exertion, orthopnoea, and bilateral leg swelling after non-compliance with fluid restriction and missing diuretic doses. Lives alone; limited mobility due to osteoarthritis.
Past Medical History: Diagnosed CHF (ejection fraction 35%) five years ago; hypertension; type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 8.2%); ex-smoker (30 pack-years); BMI 28. Takes frusemide 40mg BD, ramipril 5mg daily, metoprolol 50mg BD, metformin 1g BD. Recent weight gain 4kg in one week.
Struggling with a similar assignment to Nursing Interventions for Acute Heart Failure Exacerbation in Elderly Patients?
Our qualified academic writers — all holding Masters or PhD degrees — write fully original papers tailored to your rubric, citation style, and deadline. Rated 4.9/5 by thousands of students. Free Turnitin plagiarism report included.
Get Expert Help →Current Presentation (Day 1 Admission): Short of breath at rest, anxious, reports “can’t catch breath.”
Assessment Findings:
- Vital signs: Temp 37.2°C, RR 28/min (laboured), HR 110 bpm (irregular), SpO2 88% on 6L/min O2 via mask, BP 160/95 mmHg, Pain 4/10 (chest tightness), GCS 15/15.
- Physical: Pale, cool peripheries; bilateral crackles to mid-lung fields; 3+ pitting oedema to knees; JVP elevated 5cm; weight 85kg (baseline 81kg); dry mouth, urine output 20mL/hr via IDC.
Investigations: BNP 1,200 pg/mL (elevated); Na 128 mmol/L, K 3.2 mmol/L; ECG: AF with rate 110; CXR: pulmonary oedema; Echo: EF 32%.
Nursing Notes: IV cannula 20G left forearm; NBM for 4 hours pending GTN infusion; family visited, concerned about discharge planning; non-compliant with low-sodium diet per wife.
You are the Registered Nurse coordinating care.
Can someone write my paper professionally and confidentially?
Yes — My Homework Ace Tutors connects you with expert human writers in your subject area. Every paper is written from scratch (zero AI), checked for plagiarism, formatted to your specifications, and delivered before your deadline — 100% confidentially. Free revisions for 14 days.
🖉 Start My Order →Task Requirements
Use the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2018) to structure analysis. Process cues from scenario, prioritise issues, set goals, implement/evaluate interventions, and reflect. Incorporate multidisciplinary aspects (e.g., cardiology input) and address social determinants (e.g., isolation).
Required Sections:
- Introduction (200 words): Introduce scenario, framework, and overview of key issues (e.g., fluid overload, electrolyte imbalance, anxiety).
- Consider the Patient’s Situation (250 words): Detail history, admission context, and biopsychosocial factors (e.g., non-adherence, grief).
- Collect, Process, and Present Cues (300 words): Organise subjective/objective data; highlight abnormalities (e.g., hyponatraemia, AF). Link to pathophysiology.
- Process Information and Identify Three Nursing Issues (350 words): Prioritise based on ABCs/Maslow (e.g., impaired gas exchange, excess fluid volume, ineffective health management); justify with NMBA competencies.
- Establish Goals (200 words): Develop SMART goals for each issue (e.g., SpO2 >92% within 6 hours).
- Take Action – Nursing Interventions (500 words): Detail 2–3 evidence-based strategies per issue (e.g., oxygen titration, fluid monitoring, education); rationalise priority, link to data/history, address ethical/legal elements (e.g., capacity for consent).
- Evaluate Outcomes (100 words): Assess intervention impact; propose adjustments.
- Reflect on the Process (100 words): Analyse reasoning gaps; discuss learning for future practice.
Use 12+ peer-reviewed sources (2019–2025); Harvard referencing. Ensure person-centred language.
Rubric Criteria
| Criterion | High Distinction (85–100%) | Distinction (75–84%) | Credit (65–74%) | Pass (50–64%) | Fail (<50%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended CRC Application (30%) | Seamless integration; deep pathophysiological/psychosocial links. | Strong framework use; minor linkages. | Adequate structure; some depth. | Basic cycle; fragmented. | Framework misused. |
| Issue Prioritisation (20%) | Three issues expertly prioritised with robust evidence. | Clear priorities; solid rationale. | Issues relevant; partial evidence. | Issues identified; weak links. | Issues irrelevant. |
| Interventions & Rationale (25%) | Innovative, ethical interventions; data-driven justification. | Evidence-based; good links. | Relevant actions; descriptive. | Basic interventions; limited rationale. | Unsafe or unsupported. |
| Evaluation & Reflection (15%) | Insightful outcomes analysis; profound practice implications. | Sound evaluation; reflective. | Basic evaluation; surface reflection. | Minimal analysis. | Absent. |
| Scholarship & Structure (10%) | Exemplary writing; flawless Harvard. | Coherent; few errors. | Clear; some issues. | Readable; errors. | Disorganised; poor sources. |
Submission Instructions
Label: “StudentID_NRSG378_Ass3_CaseStudy.docx”. Upload to LEO Turnitin. Late: 10%/day. Integrity: <15% similarity. Extensions: 48 hours prior with evidence. Q&A recording on LEO Week 9.
Save 20% on your first order today
Use code SAVE20 at checkout. Our writers deliver AI-free, plagiarism-free papers — from essays to full dissertations — with deadlines from 3 hours. Money-back guarantee included.
🏢 Claim 20% Off →Learning Materials/Resources
Longhini, J., Gauthier, K., Konradsen, H., Palese, A., Kabir, Z. N. and Waldréus, N. (2025) The effectiveness of nursing interventions to improve self-care for patients with heart failure at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nursing, 24(286). doi:10.1186/s12912-025-02867-7.
Yu, S., Wei, D. and Shi, N. (2023) Comprehensive nursing intervention improves quality of life and reduces hospitalization time and expense in elderly patients with severe heart failure undergoing rh-BNP treatment. American Journal of Translational Research, 15(8), pp.5239–5248.
Ordóñez-Piedra, J., Ponce-Blandón, J. A., Robles-Romero, J. M., Gómez-Salgado, J., Jiménez-Picón, N. and Romero-Martín, M. (2021) Effectiveness of the Advanced Practice Nursing interventions in the patient with heart failure: a systematic review. Nursing Open, 8(4), pp.1879–1891. doi:10.1002/nop2.847.
Marques, C. R. d. G. et al. (2022) Educational nursing intervention in reducing hospital readmission and the mortality of patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 9(12), p.420. doi:10.3390/jcdd9120420.
