Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Writing Help

Click to fill the order details form in a few minute.

Posted: May 31st, 2023

Using the theory of unpleasant symptoms as a guide

Using the theory of unpleasant symptoms as a guide, what would you look for in an assessment tool for patient symptoms? I need a discussion with 400 words and 2 references.

________________________-
The theory of unpleasant symptoms provides a valuable framework for understanding and assessing patient symptoms in healthcare settings. According to this theory, symptoms are considered unpleasant experiences that can arise from a variety of conditions and have a significant impact on a patient’s overall well-being. When developing an assessment tool for patient symptoms, it is important to consider several key aspects guided by this theory. This discussion will explore the essential components of an assessment tool, including multidimensionality, patient-centeredness, and validity, within the context of the theory of unpleasant symptoms.

First and foremost, an assessment tool for patient symptoms should encompass a multidimensional approach. The theory of unpleasant symptoms emphasizes that symptoms are complex and can manifest in various ways, including physical, psychological, and socio-cultural dimensions. Therefore, the assessment tool should incorporate a comprehensive range of symptom domains to capture the diverse experiences patients may encounter. For instance, physical symptoms such as pain, fatigue, or nausea should be included alongside psychological symptoms like anxiety, depression, or cognitive impairment. Additionally, socio-cultural factors such as social support, financial burden, or cultural beliefs should be considered to provide a holistic understanding of the patient’s symptom experience.

Furthermore, patient-centeredness is a crucial aspect to consider in the development of an assessment tool. The theory of unpleasant symptoms highlights the subjective nature of symptoms and emphasizes the importance of patient perspectives. Therefore, the assessment tool should prioritize patient-reported outcomes and enable patients to express their experiences and priorities regarding their symptoms. Including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or patient-reported symptom measures (PRSMs) can capture patients’ self-perceived symptom severity, impact on daily functioning, and treatment effectiveness. Additionally, incorporating open-ended questions or qualitative measures can provide patients with the opportunity to express their unique experiences, preferences, and concerns, thereby promoting patient-centered care.

Finally, the validity of the assessment tool is critical in ensuring accurate and reliable measurement of patient symptoms. Content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity are important considerations. Content validity ensures that the assessment tool covers all relevant symptom dimensions as defined by the theory of unpleasant symptoms. Construct validity ensures that the tool measures what it intends to measure, reflecting the underlying constructs of the theory. Criterion validity ensures that the tool aligns with established gold standards or other recognized measures of symptom assessment.

In conclusion, an assessment tool for patient symptoms should be guided by the theory of unpleasant symptoms. It should be multidimensional, encompassing physical, psychological, and socio-cultural dimensions. It should also prioritize patient-centeredness, enabling patients to express their experiences and perspectives. Finally, the tool should demonstrate validity through content, construct, and criterion measures. By incorporating these essential components, an assessment tool can effectively capture and evaluate the diverse and subjective experiences of patients, thereby facilitating appropriate symptom management and patient-centered care.

References:

Lenz, E. R., Pugh, L. C., Milligan, R. A., Gift, A., & Suppe, F. (1997). The middle-range theory of unpleasant symptoms: An update. Advances in Nursing Science, 19(3), 14-27.

Dodd, M. J., Janson, S. L., Facione, N. C., Faucett, J., Froelicher, E. S., Humphreys, J., … & Taylor, D. (2001). Advancing the science of symptom management. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(5), 668-676.

Check Price Discount

Study Notes & Homework Samples: »

Why Choose our Custom Writing Services

We prioritize delivering top quality work sought by students.

Top Tutors

The team is composed solely of exceptionally skilled graduate writers, each possessing specialized knowledge in specific subject areas and extensive expertise in academic writing.

Discounted Pricing

Our writing services uphold the utmost quality standards while remaining budget-friendly for students. Our pricing is not only equitable but also competitive in comparison to other writing services available.

0% similarity Index

Guaranteed Plagiarism-Free Content: We assure you that every product you receive is entirely free from plagiarism. Prior to delivery, we meticulously scan each final draft to ensure its originality and authenticity for our valued customers.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with HomeworkAceTutors, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much instructions detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a custom writer who has the unique qualifications for that subject, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00